Laserfiche WebLink
The Anticompetitive Effects of Government- <br /> 14 HILL <br /> Mandated Project Labor Agreements on � �n- ��� <br /> Construction in Washington State U�� <br /> Paul Bachman, MSIE,The Beacon Hill Institute for Public Policy Research �a D� <br /> William F. Burke, BS,The Beacon Hill Institute for Public Policy Research <br /> David G.Tuerck, PhD,The Beacon Hill Institute for Public Policy Research <br /> June 2019 <br /> Executive Summary <br /> A project labor agreement (PLA) is an agreement between construction unions and contractors <br /> employed on a building project under which the firms adhere to specified work rules and hiring <br /> procedures. Typically, PLAs require that all workers be hired through union halls, that non- <br /> union workers join a union and/or pay dues for the length of the project and that union rules <br /> apply to work conditions and dispute resolution. Construction unions actively lobby <br /> governments to require PLAs to the end of securing work for their members on projects funded <br /> by taxpayers. <br /> A Community Workforce Agreement(CWA),like a PLA,is an agreement between public owners <br /> of construction projects and construction unions. The terms of a CWA are virtually identical to <br /> those specified by a PLA but with the added purpose of promoting social equity, workforce <br /> diversity, and development of local workers for construction careers.1 <br /> The Beacon Hill Institute has completed an extensive statistical analysis of the effects on school <br /> construction bids and on construction costs of PLAs in Ohio,Massachusetts,Connecticut and the <br /> state of New York. In the Ohio,Massachusetts and Connecticut studies,our analysis found final <br /> construction costs to be significantly higher when a school construction project was executed <br /> We use PLA to mean both PLAs and CWAs. <br /> The Anticompetitive Effects of Project Labor Agreements on Public Construction in Washington State 1 <br />