My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6920 SEAWAY BLVD Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SEAWAY BLVD
>
6920
>
Geotech Report
>
6920 SEAWAY BLVD Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 11:53:07 AM
Creation date
11/4/2019 1:36:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SEAWAY BLVD
Street Number
6920
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> � y,ravel deposits, or on struc[ural fill. Where footings are suppor[ed on fill, <br /> the zone ot s[ructural fill should ex[end a dis[ance equal to the [hickness of <br /> the fill beneath the footing beyond [he near Eooting edges. Cri[eria <br /> � for the selecti.on and placement of this fill are presented above under SITE <br /> PREPARATION ANJ EARTHWORK. :1ll foo[ing excavations should be exami.ned by a <br /> � member of our staff during final preparation of the bearing surface [o de[er- <br /> mine tha[ suitable soils have been exposed. <br /> IWe recortunend that all spread foo[ings have a minfmum depth of embedmen[ <br /> beloa lowes[ adjacent. graae of 18 inches. Continuous wall footings should <br /> � have a minimum width oE 18 inches, c:hile individual column Eootings should <br /> have a minimum width of 24 inches. Footings supported as recommended above <br /> may be proportioned using the allowable bearing values presented in Table 2. <br /> � ihese bearing values are for the total o[ dead and long-term live loads, ex- <br /> clusive of the weight oE the footing and any overlying backfill. The values <br /> Imay be increased by one-[hird when considering loads of short duration such <br /> f <br /> as wind or seismic Eorces. <br /> I1'able 2 - Foundation Design Criteria <br /> A. Footings supported on medium dense to very dense native glacial til] <br /> Ior uutwash sand and gravel deposits. <br /> .411owable IIe�ring Value (psf) <br /> ICon[inuous Individual <br /> Footing Width Wall Column <br /> I (fce[) Footings Footin�s <br /> 1 .5 5,000 �/p <br /> z 5,500 5,000 <br /> I3 7,000 6,000 <br /> 4 8,000 7,000 <br /> I5 or larger 8,000 8,000 <br /> B. Footings supported un structural fill. <br /> IAllowable bearing value = 3,000 psf (all footing types and sizes) <br /> Fuoting settlements are expected [o occur rapidly as loads are applied <br /> � due to the granular nature of the foundation soils. We es[imate that more <br /> heavily loaded continuous wall and individual column footings supported on <br /> native soils cuuld experience on the order of 1/4 inch, and 1/4 [0 3/4 inches <br /> uf se[tlemen� . respec[ively. Similarly, more heavily loaded con[inuous wall <br /> - 9 - �7� <br /> GeoEnglneers <br /> Incorporoted <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.