My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 3705-19
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 3705-19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2019 9:37:41 AM
Creation date
11/19/2019 9:37:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
3705-19
Date
11/6/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ownership of a dangerous dog pursuant to this chapter or Chapter 16.08 RCW and the person or <br /> domestic animal attacked or bitten by the defendant's dog trespassed on the defendant's real or <br /> personal property or provoked the defendant's dog without justification or excuse. In addition, the <br /> dangerous dog shall be immediately confiscated by an animal control authority, placed in quarantine for <br /> the proper length of time, and thereafter destroyed in an expeditious and humane manner. <br /> 6D. The owner of any dog that aggressively attacks and causes severe injury or death of any human, <br /> whether the dog has previously been declared potentially dangerous or dangerous, shall, upon <br /> conviction, be guilty of a Class C felony punishable in accordance with RCW 9A.20.021. It is an <br /> affirmative defense that the defendant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the human <br /> severely injured or killed by the defendant's dog: (1) trespassed on the defendant's real or personal <br /> property which was enclosed by fencing suitable to prevent the entry of young children and designed to <br /> prevent the dog from escaping and marked with clearly visible signs warning people, including children, <br /> not to trespass and to beware of the dog; or(2) provoked the defendant's dog without justification or <br /> excuse on the defendant's real or personal property which was enclosed by fencing suitable to prevent <br /> the entry of young children and designed to prevent the dog from escaping and marked with clearly <br /> visible signs warning people, including children, not to trespass and to beware of the dog. In such a <br /> prosecution,the state has the burden of showing that the owner of the dog either knew or should have <br /> known that the dog was potentially dangerous as defined in this chapter or Chapter 16.08 RCW.The <br /> state may not meet its burden of proof that the owner should have known the dog was potentially <br /> dangerous solely by showing the dog to be a particular breed or breeds. In addition, the dog shall be <br /> immediately confiscated by an animal control authority, quarantined, and upon conviction of the owner <br /> destroyed in an expeditious and humane manner. <br /> E. Any potentially dangerous dog or dangerous dog may be immediately seized and impounded by <br /> Everett animal control if an Everett animal control officer has probable cause to believe that the owner <br /> has failed to comply with the conditions or restrictions of this chapter or imposed by the animal control <br /> authority. Such impoundment shall be subject to the procedures of EMC 6.04.090. <br /> Section 9. Ordinance No. 1228-86 shall be amended by the addition of a new section, to be <br /> codified at EMC 6.08.047, as follows: <br /> Potentially dangerous dogs—reclassification. <br /> A. The Manager(as defined in EMC 6.04.020) shall have authority to, upon the owner's written request, <br /> review a potentially dangerous dog designation on a dog a maximum of one time per year. The Manager <br /> may maintain the designation, amend the restrictions of the potentially dangerous dog, or remove the <br /> potentially dangerous dog designation subject to the requirements herein.The potentially dangerous <br /> dog designation may be removed after 36 months from the date of designation as a potentially <br /> dangerous dog, if the Manager determines that the risk to public safety has been mitigated and the <br /> owner and the potentially dangerous dog have had no subsequent violations of Title 6 EMC.The <br /> 2019 ORDINANCE: Dangerous and <br /> Potentially Dangerous Dogs Page 12 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.