Laserfiche WebLink
EVALUATION STATEMENTS FOR BUILDING TYPE 15: <br />UNREINFORCED MASONRY BEARING WALL BUILDINGS <br />These 6uildings indude strutn{ral efe�ne��ls that vary depending on the age of �he burfding and �o a lerser <br />uten4 tht geographic location of the suucture. !�i 6itifdings buil� before 1900, �he majoriry ofJ7oar and roof <br />consnuction cansisu of woad shea�hing supported by wood subframing. !n laige multistory buifdings, the <br />J7oors orc cast-inpfact concrcte auppo.Ked 6y the unrcinjorced maronry walfs and/or steel or concrerc <br />interiar fsaming. In 6uildings buift af(tr l950, unninforced masonry buildings with wood Jloors usualfy <br />have plywood rother than board shtaU�ing. More rccencfy, in rcgions oj lawtr scismiciry, rhese buifdingr <br />can includt J1oor and roojjraming (hal cunsistt of ineta( i•ck and concnte f+!! supponed by s�eel framing <br />efemtnGt. The perimcter waUs, and possibly some intenrr wa!!s, an unrtinjorced masonry. 77it wa!ls may <br />or may not 6e anchorcd to tht diaphragms. Ties 6enveen �he wa!!s and diaphmgmr ae more common for <br />the 6earing wa!!s than for wafls rhaf are pamlfef ta du J/oor framing, Rooj des usually arc less common <br />and mon eirarically spactd than Oiose at rhe Jloor levels. /nrenor pmfitions that inrerconnect rhe J7oon <br />and roof can have the effect of reducing diaplvag»i displacements. <br />Ac'dress the following evaluation statements, marlcing each either Uue (T) or false (F�. <br />Statements that are found to be true ideutiFy issues that are acaptable according ro the <br />criteria of this handbook; statements that are found to be falso identify iuues t6at need <br />investigation. For guidauce in lhe investigation, ro[er [o the handboolc sec[ion indica[ed in <br />pareuthesu at the end of the statement. <br />Be advised that lhe numerical inditcs prcceded by an as[erisk (•) in these statements are <br />based on high seismicity (A„ = 0.4). Adjusunents are reasonable for lower seismiciry. The <br />appropriate adjustment is not necessarily a direu ratio o[ seismicity. <br />BUILDING SYSTEhiS <br />T � LOAD PATH: The structure contains a complete load path for seismic force effects from <br />any horizontal direction that scrves to transfer the inertial forcu from the mass w the <br />[oundation (NOTE: Write a brie( dcscription o( this linkage for each principal direction,) <br />(Sec. 3.1) <br />oT F REDUNDANCY: The structure will remain la[erally stable after the [ailure of an� single <br />element. (Sec.3.2) <br />QF WEAK STORY: Visual obscrvation or a Quick Check indicates Ihat there are no <br />signiticant strength discontinuities in any ot the vertical elements in the lateral-force- <br />resisling system; t6e story strength at any story is no[ less Ihan 80 percent o( the strengt6 <br />of the story above. (Sec. 33.1) <br />�f F SOFT STORY: Visual observation or a Quick Chock indiwtes that there are no <br />signiticant stitfneu discontinuities in any of the vertical elements in tho la[eral-force- <br />resisting system; the lateral stifFuess of a story is not less than 70 perceot of that in the <br />story above or less than 80 percent o[ the averege stitCness of the three stories above. <br />(Sec. 33.2) <br />B•53 (Typc 15) <br />