Laserfiche WebLink
c. The inclusion of one or more additional factors that will fairly represent the taxpayer's business <br /> activity in the city; or <br /> d. The employment of any other method to effectuate an equitable allocation and apportionment of <br /> the taxpayer's income. <br /> 5. The party petitioning for, or the tax administrator requiring, the use of any method to effectuate an <br /> equitable allocation and apportionment of the taxpayer's income pursuant to subsection (4) of this <br /> subsection (F) must prove by a preponderance of the evidence: <br /> a. That the allocation and apportionment provisions of this subsection (F) do not fairly represent the <br /> extent of the taxpayer's business activity in the city; and <br /> b. That the alternative to such provisions is reasonable. <br /> The same burden of proof shall apply whether the taxpayer is petitioning for, or the tax administrator is <br /> requiring, the use of an alternative, reasonable method to effectuate an equitable allocation and <br /> apportionment of the taxpayer's income. <br /> 6. If the tax administrator requires any method to effectuate an equitable allocation and <br /> apportionment of the taxpayer's income,the tax administrator cannot impose any civil or criminal <br /> penalty with reference to the tax due that is attributable to the taxpayer's reasonable reliance solely on <br /> the allocation and apportionment provisions of this subsection (F). <br /> 7. A taxpayer that has received written permission from the tax administrator to use a reasonable <br /> method to effectuate an equitable allocation and apportionment of the taxpayer's income shall not <br /> have that permission revoked with respect to transactions and activities that have already occurred <br /> unless there has been a material change in, or a material misrepresentation of, the facts provided by the <br /> taxpayer upon which the tax administrator reasonable relied in approving a reasonable alternative <br /> method. <br /> G. The definitions in this subsection apply throughout this section. <br /> 1. "Apportionable income" means the gross income of the business taxable under the service <br /> classifications of a city's gross receipts tax, including income received from activities outside the city if <br /> the income would be taxable under the service classification if received from activities within the city, <br /> less any exemptions or deductions available. <br /> 2. "Business activities tax" means a tax measured by the amount of, or economic results of, business <br /> activity conducted in a city or county within the United States or within a foreign country. The term <br /> includes taxes measured in whole or in •art on net income or :ross income or recei•ts. "Business <br /> activities tax" does not include a sales tax, use tax, or a similar transaction tax, imposed on the sale or <br /> acquisition of goods or services, whether or not denominated a gross receipts tax or a tax imposed on <br /> the privilege of doing business. <br /> 32. "Compensation" means wages, salaries, commissions, and any other form of remuneration paid to <br /> individuals for personal services that are or would be included in the individual's gross income under the <br /> federal Internal Revenue Code. <br /> 2019 ORDINANCE: Business and Occupation Tax Page 26 of 40 <br />