Laserfiche WebLink
, j , <br /> Propased Madernization and Additioru to Subsurface Ezploration, Gealogic Hazards, <br /> Eisenhower.�liddle Schaof ond Geotechnica!Engineering Report <br /> Everett, Washrngton Geolo,qic Hazards and MitiRations <br /> II. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND MITIGATIONS <br /> The following discussion of potential geologic hazards is based on the geologic, slope, and <br /> ground and surface water conditions as observed and discussed herein. The discussion will be <br /> limited to seismic issues, landslides or mass-wasting, and erosion, including sed'nnent <br /> transport. <br /> 5.0 SEISMIC HAZARDS AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION <br /> Earthquakes r :ur in the F'uget Sound Lowlar.:i with great regulariry. The vast major:ty of <br /> these events ..re small and are usually not felt by people. However, large earthquakes do occur <br /> as evidenced by the most recent 6.8-magnitude event on February 28, 2001 near Olympia <br /> Washington, the 1965, 6.5-magnitude event, and the 1949, 7.2-magnitude event. The 1949 <br /> earthquake appears to have been the largestin this area during recorded history. Evaluation of <br /> return rates indicates that an earthquake of the magnitude between 5.5 and 6.0 is likely within <br /> a given 20-year period. <br /> Generally, there are four types of potential geologic hazards associated with large seismic <br /> events: 1) surficial ground rupture; 2) seismically induced landslides; 3) liquefaction; and <br /> 4) ground motion. The potential for each of these hazards to adversely impact the proposed <br /> project is discussed below. <br />, 5.1 Surficial Ground Rupmre <br /> Generally, the lac�est earthquakes which have occurred in the Puget Sound area are sub-crustal <br /> events with epicenters ranging from 50 to 70 kilometers in depth. For this reason, surficial <br /> faulting is thought to be relatively uncommon and knowledge ef fault locations is limited. In <br /> general, the risk of surface rupture at the site during a seismic event is thought ro be small. <br /> 5.2 Seismicallv Induced Landslicles <br /> The potential risk of damage to new structures by a seismically induced landslide is considered <br /> to be low due to relatively eentle slopes on the project and no sign of existin� slope instabiliry. <br /> 5.3 Liquefaction <br /> I.iquefaction is a process throu;h �vhich unconsolidated soil loses strer.gth as a result of <br /> vibra�ory shaking, such as that �vhich occurs during a seismic event. During normal <br /> conditions, the weieht of the soil is supported by both grain-to-grai❑ contacts and by the <br /> pressure within the pore spaces of the soil below the water table. Extreme vibratory shaking <br /> �Q1t�1O^•� ��� ��'� ASSOCUTEDE.tRTNSC/E:VCES, lh'C. <br /> .t2(d-A'E0J7J9:IJ-Prn�ran]tx7JJJ9iA'E'�IIP-11^R FaP�e 7 �Q <br />