My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10200 25TH AVE SE Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
25TH AVE SE
>
10200
>
Geotech Report
>
10200 25TH AVE SE Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 1:01:31 PM
Creation date
12/12/2019 2:24:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
25TH AVE SE
Street Number
10200
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f. <br /> Proposed b.o irn.iEation nnd Additions to Subsurface Exploration, Geo[ogic Hazardr, <br /> Eisenhower l9iddle School and Geotechnical Engmeering Repon <br /> Everea, Wiuhin ron <br /> �� Desixn Recommend:tions <br /> from the building. In addition, al: retaining walls and modular block walls sb.ould be lined <br /> with a minimum 12-inch-thick washed gravel blanket provided to within 1 foot of the top of <br /> wall, and which ties into the fcnting drain. Modular block walis should also be provided with <br /> chimney drains. Roof and surface runoff should not discharge into the footing drain system <br /> but should be handfed by a separate, rigid, tightline drain. Exterior grades adjacent to walis <br /> should be sloped downward away from the structure to achieve surface drainage. <br /> 14.0 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Pavement design will depend ro some extent on the soil that esists beneath the area to be <br /> paved. Where paving is planned above areas of existing fill we recommend that the paving <br /> section be constructed above at least 2 feet of new, properly compacted, granular structural fill <br /> or the existing fill recompacted to the minimum specified compaction required for structural <br /> fill. The 2 feet of structural fill below the pavement can be provided hy the removal and <br /> recompaction of existing fili soils where moisture is within the compa[ible range. The new <br /> structural fill will not be required beiow paving areas that are dirPrtly underlain by suitable till. <br /> We recommend that paving subgrades be :•ompacted to 95 �;ercent of the modified Proctor <br /> maximum dry density as determined by ASTM:D 1557 and to a firm, unyielding condition. <br /> Following compaction, the areas to be paved should be proof-rolled with a loaded dump truck <br /> or other suitable equipment under the observation of the geotechnical engineer. Any soft, <br /> loose, or yieiding areas identified by proof-rolling should be repaired prior to further work. <br /> Following subgrade preparation, we recommend a passenger car pavement section consisting <br /> of a 2�h-inch compacted asphalt pavino above a 4-inch compacted crushed rock base. In areas <br /> where buses, garbage trucks, fire trucks, defivery trucks, or other heavy vehicles will be <br /> driven or parked, we recommend a paving section consisting of 4 inches of asphalt paving <br /> above 6 inches of crushed rock base. <br /> Pavement thickness desion is a compromise beiween higher initial cost wit;: longer design life II <br /> and lower maintenance, and lower initial cost with higher maintenance requirements and �� <br /> shorter design life. The recommended pavement sections are intended to provide a 20-year <br /> service life with normal maintenance. Normal maintenance rypically includes periodic sealing, <br /> and at least one renovation that includes repair and overlay of damaged areas. <br /> 15.0 PROJECT DESIGN AND RECOMNIENDATIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY <br /> We are available to provide additional georechnical consultation and exploration where the <br /> project design chan;es from that upon which this report is based. We recommend that AESI <br /> perform a geotechnical review of the plans prior to final design completion. In this way, our <br /> earthwork and foundation recommenda[ions may be properly interpreted and implemented in <br /> J°7O�n� �3• ��'� dSSOG.aT£D E�RTN SCI£�VCES. 6VC. � <br /> .4lT�ld-XEOJ:J.4:1J-Prn�rntiClXli:i9lKE�lYP-117K P3gE ZO � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.