My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
202 ALDER ST Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
ALDER ST
>
202
>
Geotech Report
>
202 ALDER ST Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 1:02:39 PM
Creation date
12/16/2019 8:46:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
ALDER ST
Street Number
202
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br /> , P�oposeC VieK�Ridge Subsurface Erplorolion, Geologic Hazards. lnfilnation Porentml. <br /> Elernentarv Srhoo!Repfacement and Preliminary Geotechnic�!Engrneenng Repan <br /> Everz;t, Wa hin ton Project and Sitr Conditiuns <br /> ' 4.1 StratiRraphy <br /> , Surficinl Topsoil <br /> Those exploration borings not located in paved areas generally encountered approximately <br /> , 6 inches of grass and topsoil. Topsoil is not suitable for swctural support, and should be <br /> stripped from structural areas. Excavated topsoil may be suitable for reuse in landscape areas. <br /> , Ezisting Paving <br /> ' Existing paving was encountered at one of the boring locatio�s. The asphalt paving was <br /> approximately 3 inches thick at the location of EB-7. Existing paving should be removed from <br /> below planned building azeas. <br /> , Fill <br /> , Existing fill was encouutered in two of our explorations to maxunum depths of approximately <br /> 10 feet below the existing ground surface. Possible exis�.ing fill was encountered in two <br /> additional explorations. It should be noted that some o: the existing fill appears to consist of <br /> ' soils derived on-site and are difficult to distinguish from intac. site soils in exploration borings. <br /> Typically, such determinations are much easier in open excavations such as those that are made <br /> ' at the time of construction. <br /> Existing fill is not suitable for structural support without remedial prepazation as described in <br /> ' the "Site Preparation" section of this report. Existing fill should be replaced below planned <br /> building areas, and should be re-worked under paving. Excavated existing fill material is <br /> suitable for reuse in structural fiil applications if it is free of excessive organic material and <br /> ' other deleterious materials and is allowed by the project plans and speciCcations. <br /> Advance Outr�ash <br /> ' Relow the surficial fill where it was present, all of the exploration borings encountered dense <br /> sand with few silt and silt stringers interpreted as Vashon advance outwash sediments. <br /> ' Advance outwash was deposited at the base of an advaucing glacier, and was subsequendy <br /> compacted by the weight of the overlying glacial ice. Advance outwash deposits typically <br /> , exhibit gradational stratificatioo, including stringers consisting of silt and/or silry sand. Such <br /> stratification has the po[ential to iimit advance outwash sediments from performing wel] as an <br /> infilvation receptor. The construction of pit d-�ins, as discussed in this repon, penetrates finer <br /> ' strata and substantially improves the ability of advance outwash to serve as an infiltration <br /> receptor. Excavated advance outwash sediments are expected to be suitable for reuse in <br /> ' Seytember 22, 2010 ASSOC/ATEU EARTH SCIENCES, INC. I <br /> BK'G/ib�KE!(X12.SSA2-P�ajecrt110/0�73551KFtWF page 4 � <br /> ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.