Laserfiche WebLink
I ,. <br /> � <br /> � <br /> - _ � _ ECE�vra ._, , � <br /> , � � <br /> ` <br /> BO�RD OP AWUSTlPNT <br /> FIMDING3, CONCL�4IOM3 AIfD ORDBp <br /> (�atKanae'�p76-86) <br /> Bae�d npon the rritten roQueaC tor a variano� froa Lh� Citp'e, zonio� <br /> oode� apsoifloally Seo.19.40.020, to allow 18 off-atre�C parlciag epao�� <br /> ina:ead of 21 aa required by code in oon�unotlon with aonverting warehousa <br /> apro� for ths expanaian of an ezisEing retail epaoa, msd� by Sound Saf�ty <br /> Produata, hereinafter raferred to aa "Applioant," regarding prop�rty looat�d <br /> at 3602 Btroadway, the Board oP edJustment, following a publio hearing on � <br /> said application held on Juno 2, 19d6, and further having reviewed all <br /> t�atimony� maicea Lhe following Findingn, Conolueiona, and Orders <br /> PINGINGS AND C.riNCLUSI0N3f <br /> 1. That there have been exceptional or extreordinary oirouastances or <br /> conditiona applying to the rubyeat property or aa to the intended us� <br /> thereut Lhat do not apply generally to other propartiea in the a�� <br /> vicinity or zone. <br /> � <br /> a. Finding: The applicant has estimated that th� axisting par{cing <br /> area ie fully utilized or�.y 'i5 percent oP no[�al buein�as <br /> houra. The�e are several other oommerolal uesa in ths vicinity <br /> Por whieh parking is not euff!cient at given perioda during <br /> aperating i�ours. The applioant feels that Lhe propoeed <br /> expansion of the retail aalea area Nill not inoreaee the <br /> parcentage of time during Nhiah the parkina loE is fully <br /> utilized. <br /> . b. Conclusion: There are extraordinary circumatanoee Ypplying to <br /> the uee of ths proar.:ty and the nature of th� bueiness Lhat do <br /> not apply to the other buaineeaea in the vioinity and ths <br /> increase in Lhe s^ea devoted to retail salee will not chang� <br /> Lhe general parking lot usage under the current arrangement. <br /> 2. That such varianee is necessary for the preaervation and en�oyasnt of <br /> a eubatantial property right oP the appellant posaeseed by ths ownera <br /> nP oLher propertien in the ssme vioinity or zone. <br /> a. Finding: The owner of the sub�ect pt^operty has indicated that <br /> other commerolal. use3.. tn the vininity exceed Lheir parking <br /> supply during peaic .perlcds and that the on-stree: parking <br /> sp�ces are then util.ized. <br /> b. Conclusicn: The use of on-street parking apaces for the <br /> subJect property during per.i:, ;�erlods is a privilege en�oyed by <br /> other businesses in the vieinity and the approval of the <br /> request of tha applicant does no* constitute a grant of speclal <br /> priviinge inconsistent with the limitations on other propertias <br /> in th� vlcinity. <br /> 3• That the authorization of auch variancd will not be materially <br /> detrimental Lo the publie welf'are or in�urious to property in the <br /> viclnity or zona in which the property ls located. <br /> a. FinC�ng: The sub�oct rroperty is attractively landscapad and <br /> maintained. The axpansion of the retail sales area is not <br /> anticipaCeu to changa tiie amount of time whieh the parking lot <br /> is fuJ.ly uLilized because of tho seasonal natur•e oP peak <br /> periods of businas.v. <br />