My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2802 HOYT AVE EVERETT ELKS Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
HOYT AVE
>
2802
>
EVERETT ELKS
>
Geotech Report
>
2802 HOYT AVE EVERETT ELKS Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 1:09:12 PM
Creation date
1/27/2020 10:25:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HOYT AVE
Street Number
2802
Tenant Name
EVERETT ELKS
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br />Everett Elks Club <br />November 2, 2006 <br />NGA File No. 751106 <br />Page 13 <br />through the use of cut-off or "French" type drains. The need, extent, and actual design of such systems <br />will depend on prevailing conditions. This can be evaluated at the time of construction. <br />We recommend the use of footing drains around structures. Footing drains should be installed at least one <br />foot below planned finished floor elevation. The drains should consist of a minimum four -inch -diameter, <br />rigid, slotted or perforated, PVC pipe surrounded by free -draining material wrapped in a filter fabric. We <br />recommend that the free -draining material consist of an 18-inch-wide zone of clean (less than threc- <br />percent fines), granular material placed along the back of walls. Pea gravel is an acceptable drain <br />material or drainage composite may also be used instead. Tire free -draining material should extend up the <br />wall to one foot below the finished surface. The top foot of soil should consist of impermeable soil <br />placed over plastic sheeting or building paper to minimize surface water or fines migration into the <br />footing drain. Footing drains should discharge into tightlines leading to an appropriate coliection and <br />discharge point with convenient cicanouts to prolong the useful life of the drains. Roof drains should not <br />be connected to wall or footing drains. <br />Footing drains as described above may not be feasible if a permanent shoring wall is utilized. In that <br />case, water should be allowed to seep through the shoring wall face and then be collected in a drainage <br />system installed in front of the shoring wall. Typically a concrete or a CMU wall is placed in front of the <br />shoring wall and the drainage system is placed between the two walls. This drainage system could consist <br />of a suitable drainage composite connected to a perforated drain pipe. The perforated pipe would transmit <br />the collected water under gravity into the storm system, or the water can be routed to a sump where it can <br />be pumped out. <br />USE OF THIS REI'OR'C <br />NGA b'ts prepared this report for Gary Parkinson Architects, and their agents, for use in the feasibility <br />planning and budgeting of the development planned on this site only. The scope of our work does not <br />include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to <br />direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, e; cept as specifically described in <br />our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the <br />explorations and also with time. Our report, conclusions, and interpretations should not be construed as a <br />warranty of subsurface conditions. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the <br />bu�get and schedule. <br />NELSON GEOTECH.NICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.