Laserfiche WebLink
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br />Everett Elks Club <br />November 2, 2006 <br />NGA File No. 751106 <br />Page 13 <br />through the use of cut-off or "French" type drains. The need, extent, and actual design of such systems <br />will depend on prevailing conditions. This can be evaluated at the time of construction. <br />We recommend the use of footing drains around structures. Footing drains should be installed at least one <br />foot below planned finished floor elevation. The drains should consist of a minimum four -inch -diameter, <br />rigid, slotted or perforated, PVC pipe surrounded by free -draining material wrapped in a filter fabric. We <br />recommend that the free -draining material consist of an 18-inch-wide zone of clean (less than threc- <br />percent fines), granular material placed along the back of walls. Pea gravel is an acceptable drain <br />material or drainage composite may also be used instead. Tire free -draining material should extend up the <br />wall to one foot below the finished surface. The top foot of soil should consist of impermeable soil <br />placed over plastic sheeting or building paper to minimize surface water or fines migration into the <br />footing drain. Footing drains should discharge into tightlines leading to an appropriate coliection and <br />discharge point with convenient cicanouts to prolong the useful life of the drains. Roof drains should not <br />be connected to wall or footing drains. <br />Footing drains as described above may not be feasible if a permanent shoring wall is utilized. In that <br />case, water should be allowed to seep through the shoring wall face and then be collected in a drainage <br />system installed in front of the shoring wall. Typically a concrete or a CMU wall is placed in front of the <br />shoring wall and the drainage system is placed between the two walls. This drainage system could consist <br />of a suitable drainage composite connected to a perforated drain pipe. The perforated pipe would transmit <br />the collected water under gravity into the storm system, or the water can be routed to a sump where it can <br />be pumped out. <br />USE OF THIS REI'OR'C <br />NGA b'ts prepared this report for Gary Parkinson Architects, and their agents, for use in the feasibility <br />planning and budgeting of the development planned on this site only. The scope of our work does not <br />include services related to construction safety precautions and our recommendations are not intended to <br />direct the contractors' methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, e; cept as specifically described in <br />our report for consideration in design. There are possible variations in subsurface conditions between the <br />explorations and also with time. Our report, conclusions, and interpretations should not be construed as a <br />warranty of subsurface conditions. A contingency for unanticipated conditions should be included in the <br />bu�get and schedule. <br />NELSON GEOTECH.NICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />