Laserfiche WebLink
H H <br />b � <br />ro <br />C H <br />7 H{� N <br />H 5 Nn <br />� H 'F <br />O la D <br />� N H <br />� H � <br />°z n o <br />r+ cn o <br />c� • n❑ <br />� H tL <br />H y <br />O N <br />O H <br />n C N <br />�3 � r <br />�v �a <br />z y m <br />yom <br />�f � <br />, <br />�� <br />� o' <br />� =. <br />P���S� i/ �� <br />MGMORANDUM <br />TO: James Driscoll, He�lring Examiner <br />FROM: Cr�ig'fiu�lerron, Real Property Manager <br />/ <br />DATE: November 24, 1992 <br />SUBJECT: SPOR7'Y'S I3GEF AND BRE�V/APPGAL N892 <br />In response to a reyuest by Larry Crawford Assistant Public Works Direcror, I havc <br />analyzed the above referenced property (6503 Evergreen Way) for the purpose or <br />forming an opinion of the market value otthe building onl as of 1989. <br />In order to determine a presumptive building value as of 1939, I have considerecl th� <br />followin6: <br />1) The building was assessed at a value of �109,900 for tlie 1987 tax year. For <br />Purposes discussed later, it should be noted diat the Snohomish Counry <br />Assessors detennined a depreciation factor of 554'o in determining this value. <br />It is przsi:med that this is physical depreciation only and does not consider <br />functional and economic obsolescence. <br />2) The building was again revalued in 1991 at $219,200. This value was <br />determined after the properry owner had appe�lled die Assessors value of <br />$280,000+ to the Board of Lqualization. The he�lring before Uie Board of <br />Equalization is based upon testimony provided by the appellant and the Coi�nry <br />Assessors' staff. It can be re�lsonably assumed that the $219,2000 is indicative <br />of a fair market value. Therefore, "backing out" die $73,423 cost and expense <br />to remodel the subject building in 1989, could reFlect a building value of <br />$145,777. <br />3) A copy of an appraisal dated May 2, 1988, that was submittecl by the appellant <br />to assist in cletermining the buildmg value as of the date of the appra�sal has <br />been reviewed. Gven thaugh this report was on an adjacent property and nut <br />the sttbjec[ property the report had been revised (presumpUvely by the <br />appellant) to indicate a subject building replacement value of the subject at <br />�17�,200 (4920 square fcet �n $35.00). However, no consideration was given <br />to the tact lhat the subject build'uig was physically depreciated. As noted in /!1 <br />abovc, in 1987, the Snohomish County Assessors had calculated a depreciation <br />factor of 55% of replacement value. <br />This would indicate a building value of $77,490 ($172,200 less $94,710). <br />PIe�1se be advised this is not an appraisal of the subject building's 1989 value. I[ <br />merely utilizes the information Ihat was provided to me in order to extrac[ a historic <br />value. The analysis above is subjective, but it does assist in calculating a potential <br />building value circa 198). <br />CP:cAlrywn)J <br />CITY OF EVERETT• 3200 Cedar Street • Everelt, WA 98201 •(206) 259-8800 • Fax (206) 259•8882 ��' <br />