Laserfiche WebLink
October 31, 1986 <br />MIKE PALP£R <br />FULTONS CROSSING APAR7MENTS <br />120 SE EVERETT MALL WAY <br />EVERETT, MA 98204 <br />Dear Sir: <br />As applies to: <br />������M�� <br />n�v o �j 19SG <br />. ........ ..... .... ................... .......... <br />CITY OF EVERETT <br />Pct:ic V�'crks �^.co:. <br />2566i <br />,..s._�..._ <br />aTr ov <br />everett <br />ey�• 0<.;5... . . <br />CVEaE'� v.:.-�•,_i :� <br />��� :. : . .::.:.::. <br />Lot Par A Block 14 of Interci.ty Addition, Div �1 as per plot recorded in <br />Vol. II of plats, page 9 records of Snohomish Co. WA; Parcel 8 E 1/2 of NE <br />quarter of Sec. 24, Township 28, R4 Snohomish WA. <br />Due to an oversight when the planned layout of the apartment complex was <br />reviewed, two ef the buildings, numbers 10 and 11, remained without a <br />satisfactory means of access by the Fire Departmer . This situation was not <br />discovered until construction was well underway ana it was impossible to move <br />a building. <br />An on-site meeting was held on an undetermined date with <br />representing the contractor, Larry Crawford representing <br />Department, and Sam Preston and Engine Company 6 Captain <br />representing the Fire Department. At that meeting it wa: <br />lane, ten feet wide, extending between Buildings 3 and 4 <br />corner of Buildin� 11 rrould give the Fire Department acc� <br />and 11. Nmile this is not ideal, it was felt that under <br />would SuffiCe. <br />Mike Palmer <br />the Building <br />Rabert Jack <br />agreed that a fire <br />to the southeast <br />ss to euildings 10 <br />the circumsta�ces it <br />�n October 21, 1986, Mr. Palmer came to the Fire Prevention office with the <br />information on the proposed surface known as "grass rings." It was approved, <br />and Me again went to the site to review the approach end location of the fire <br />lane. At the site, representing the contractor was Mike Palmer and <br />representing the Fire Department, John Whitaker and Captain Robert Jack with <br />Engine Company 6. The plan was approved with the understanding that the fire <br />lane would remain clearly marked and posted as such and maintained. <br />eecause of the surface, which is grass, the lane would not be easily <br />distinguished at night by a fire company responding to a fire. It was, <br />therefore, agreed that when the landscapers became involved at a later date, <br />we would meet again and determine a method of distinguishi�ig the fire lane <br />from the surrounding grass or lantlscape not covering the prepared roadbed. <br />