My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
120 SE EVERETT MALL WAY Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
SE EVERETT MALL WAY
>
120
>
Geotech Report
>
120 SE EVERETT MALL WAY Geotech Report 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 1:09:55 PM
Creation date
2/4/2020 10:28:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SE EVERETT MALL WAY
Street Number
120
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Crow-Western E-2708 <br />August 14, 1985 Page 9 <br />The locations of the test pits were approximately determined <br />by pacing from survey control stakes present on the site. <br />Elevations of test pits were approximately determined by <br />interpolation between plan contours. The locations and elevations <br />of the test pits should be considered accurate only to the degrae <br />implied by the method used. <br />The field exploration was continuously monitored by an engi- <br />neering geologist from our firm who classified the soils <br />encountered, maintained a log of each test pit, obtained <br />representative bulk soil samples and observed pertinent site <br />features. Soils were classified visually in the field according <br />to the Unified Soil Classification System which is presented on <br />Plate 3, Legend. The consistency of the soil was estimated based <br />on the effort required to excavate the soil, the stability of the <br />trench walls and other factors. Logs of the individual test pits <br />are presented on Plates 4 through 10, Test pit Logs. The Einal <br />logs represent our interpretations of the fieid logs and the <br />results of the laboratory examination and test of field samples. <br />The stratification lines on the logs represent the approximate <br />boundary between soil types. In actuality, the transition may he <br />gradual. <br />Representative soil samples were placed in closed containers <br />and returned to our laboratory for Eurther examination and test- <br />ing. Visual classifications were supplemented by index tests such <br />as sieve analyses on representative samples. Moisture determina- <br />tions were performed on all samples. Results of moisture determin- <br />ations, together with classifications, are shown on the test pit <br />logs included in this report. The results cf the sieve analyses <br />are illustraked on Plates 11 and 12, Grain Size Analyses. <br />LIMITATIONS <br />Our recommendations and conclusions are based on the site <br />materials obser.ved, selective laboratory testing and engineering <br />analyses. The conclusions and recommendations are professional <br />opinions derived in accordance with current standards oE practice. <br />No warranty is expressed or implied. <br />The recommendations submitted in this report are based upon <br />the data obtained from the test pits. Soil and groundwater <br />conditions between explorations may vary from those encountered. <br />The nature and extent of variations may not become evident until <br />construction. If variations then appear, Earth Consultants, Inc. <br />should be allowed to reevaluate the reconunendations of this report <br />prior to proceeding with the construction. <br />Eanh Consuhants,lnc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.