My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4920 EVERGREEN WAY STAPLES Geotech Report 2022-10-25
>
Address Records
>
EVERGREEN WAY
>
4920
>
STAPLES
>
Geotech Report
>
4920 EVERGREEN WAY STAPLES Geotech Report 2022-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 1:10:28 PM
Creation date
2/7/2020 8:57:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EVERGREEN WAY
Street Number
4920
Tenant Name
STAPLES
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Report lierracon <br /> Staples Rockery Failure • Everett,Washington <br /> March 8, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. 81175122 <br /> can temporarily remain in place and provide limited temporary support until the soldier pile wall is <br /> constructed behind it. The rockery wall would be removed progressively as the retaining wall is <br /> constructed. A permanent easement will be required within the Glacier Lane right-of-way in order <br /> to construct the soldier pile wall and associated tieback anchors. <br /> We estimate that loose to dense cohesionless soils exist in the upper 23 feet, which is nearly the <br /> full height of the rockery. The contact of the loose to dense disturbed advance outwash and the <br /> underlying dense to very dense advance outwash approximately coincides with the base of the <br /> rockery. Portions of the tieback bond zone will be within both soil units, while soldier piles will be <br /> founded almost entirely in the dense to very dense advance outwash sand. <br /> Construction sequencing will be critical for deconstructing the existing rockery in a manner that <br /> will not result in further ground displacement or erosion of the right-of-way. Furthermore, <br /> construction vibrations and surcharging could negatively impact the rockery, which is currently <br /> considered unstable. <br /> Geotechnical engineering recommendations for the retaining wall system and other earth- <br /> "! connected phases of the project are outlined below. The recommendations contained in this <br /> report are based upon the results of data presented herein, engineering analyses, and on our <br /> current understanding of the proposed project. <br /> 4.2 Earthwork <br /> Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in our exploration, we expect that the on-site <br /> soil within the limits of construction can be removed with conventional excavation and <br /> augering/drilling equipment. Earthwork should be limited to only that necessary to construct the <br /> retaining wall to avoid surcharging the rockery, which in its present state should be considered <br /> unstable. Earthwork activities such as proof-rolling and compaction should be performed after <br /> retaining wall construction is complete. Recommendations for site preparation, structural fill, and <br /> temporary slopes are presented below. <br /> 4.2.1 Site Preparation <br /> Prior to equipment arriving onsite, clearing and grading limits should be established and marked. <br /> Silt fences should be constructed along the downslope side of all areas planned for clearing and <br /> grading. Preparation for site grading and construction should begin with procedures intended to <br /> control surface water runoff. The sandy soil on site is susceptible to erosion by flowing water. We <br /> anticipate that the use of silt fences, straw waddles, and wood slash will be adequate for surface <br /> water control during wet weather and wet site conditions. <br /> After construction of the retaining wall, areas that are to be stripped, excavated, regraded, or are <br /> to receive structural fill, should be proof-rolled with heavy compaction equipment. Any soft, loose, <br /> or otherwise unsuitable areas identified during proof-rolling should be recompacted if practical or <br /> Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.