Laserfiche WebLink
1n <br /> The traffic analysis shall identify and/or include the following elements with respect to <br /> transportation improvements to mitigate the project's likely transportation impacts: <br /> improvements required to maintain level of service standards. local frontage improvements, <br /> proportionate share for planned improvements as identified in this ordinance, and any other <br /> elements required by the City Traffic Engineer to adequately mitigate traffic impacts from the <br /> project. • <br /> The City Traffic Engineer may promulgate additional rules and standards regarding mitigation <br /> analysis and plans. These additional rules shall be published in the City of Everett Standards and <br /> Specifications Manual. The City Traffic Engineer will consult with the Responsible Official as <br /> necessary to ensure that the traffic analysis guidelines provide adequate information on <br /> environmental impacts. <br /> 8.1 Improvements required by regulations and level of service standards. Principal <br /> improvements needed to comply with City regulations and requirements(including frontage and <br /> traffic safety improvements under EMC 13.68), and improvements proposed to maintain an <br /> acceptable Level of Service under sections 9 and 10 of this ordinance. <br /> 8.2 Transportation demand management analysis. An evaluation of all practical <br /> measures that could be included in a transportation demand management (TDM) program to <br /> further reduce traffic impacts, for those projects where' the City Traffic Engineer or the <br /> Responsible Official determine under section 9 of this chapter that transportation improvements <br /> that could attain Level of Service"D"may not be practical(i.e.,reasonable and capable of being <br /> accomplished). TDM program analysis shall also be required for any project in the core area to <br /> reduce vehicle trips below 75%of the standard ITE trip generation rate. <br /> 8.3 Other improvements to address project impacts. Improvements proposed or under <br /> consideration to address adverse transportation impacts, if any, identified in the traffic analysis, <br /> such as bicycle and pedestrian safety,freight mobility,or other measures. <br /> 8.4 Consistency with development regulations or comprehensive plan. A proposed <br /> analysis of consistency with development regulations or, in their absence, comprehensive plan <br /> provisions relating to transportation infrastructure and characteristics of development, for those <br /> projects where the City Engineer or Responsible Official conclude that this analysis is needed to <br /> assist the City to determine consistency under EMC 15.04. <br /> 8.5 Cost estimates. Associated planning level cost estimates for the above improvements, <br /> including the estimated fair share cost of transportation system improvements calculated under <br /> I section 10 of this ordinance, if required by the City Traffic Engineer or if an applicant does not <br /> accept the City's analysis of reasonable mitigation measures. <br /> 8.6 Proposed mitigation plan and mitigation commitments. A proposed mitigation plan, <br /> which lists, summarizes,or clearly illustrates on figures and/or tables the improvements that the <br /> applicant is committed to.implement. The proposed mitigation plan shall state whether the . <br /> applicant: (1)will construct specific transportation improvements or pay the City for the cost of <br /> constructing improvements; and (2) will contribute the identified fair share of traffic system <br /> improvements. <br /> -5- <br /> 50 <br />