Laserfiche WebLink
1 0 <br /> Fewer than 10 new vehicle trips per (not applicable;no traffic study) <br /> 0 <br /> day <br /> • <br /> applicable;no traffic study) $�E for each peak hour trip <br /> • �•_-10 Dr moiv new vehicle (notPP ��p,+{ <br /> trips per day,but- °_ii&more <br /> than 50 additional eak hour trips* <br /> • hare of <br /> lanned <br /> More than 50 additional peak hour improvements or fair(e g.identified in the hour trip <br /> Itrips* City's six year transportation $9O0 g for each peak <br /> setoff 10.4 <br /> lI improvementpro�am) -----� <br /> plus: plus: <br /> 2.Fair share of additional <br /> improvements,if any,to maintain <br /> acceptable levels of service as a result <br /> of the proposed project,as follows: <br /> If"D"or better at horizon year and no <br /> need for additional improvements 0 <br /> (taking growth into account)---r <br /> Project alone causes need for <br /> additional improvements at horizon _ -- <br /> year(no need if project did not occur, 100%of cost of improvements <br /> taking growth into account)-� <br /> Additional improvements needed to Project's%of total peak hour trips <br /> maintain"D"or better at horizon at horizon year,minus existing <br /> year,due to project and growth-)- peak hour volume <br /> Additional improvements needed at Project's%of total peak hour trips <br /> horizon year due to project and at horizon year <br /> growth,but current level of service is <br /> "E"or"F"-; <br /> *for proposed projects in core area (net-agfllieable ne- e' y) 999-2004? <br /> trip calculation at <br /> s9o2 %% of SITE Trip Generation <br /> Manual or as justified in a traffic <br /> • <br /> anal sis <br /> Secti_ onlO: Fair share of system improvements <br /> e <br /> ion <br /> sportation <br /> Two components of fair erw se agreed by te. This he City Trafficn specifies s Engineer. The fairt share shall <br /> system improvements,unless otherwise <br /> consists of two components: <br /> -8 • <br /> - <br /> 53 <br />