Laserfiche WebLink
research with national laboratories, universities and industry partners to overcome technical barriers to the <br />reliability, cost and performance of fuel cell systems. Fuel cells are currently being developed for passenger <br />vehicles, buildings and small applications such as computers. <br />1 D. Improvements to Heavy Duty Vehicles <br />The fourth supposition regarding the potential for improvements to the vehicle fleet in the Puget Sound region is <br />what improvements in the fuel economy of heavy duty vehicles might be possible by 2040. This area is less <br />robust in terms of the research and data available, but also has perhaps the most potential in significant <br />improvements due to the relatively large share of carbon emissions per vehicle and the overall increase in freight <br />truck emissions in the last 20 years. Research conducted on this topic included studies and analyses conducted <br />by the following agencies or institutions (a full bibliography of sources is included at the end of this white paper): <br />• U.S. EPA <br />• Federal Highway Administration <br />• Air and Waste Management Association <br />• David Suzuki Foundation <br />• Levelton Consultants, Ltd. <br />• U.S. Department of Energy <br />• Washington State Department of Ecology <br />• California Air Resources Board <br />There are a variety of factors in play when discussing heavy duty, or freight, truck emissions. These include not <br />just the efficiency of the vehicles, but also details with the movement of freight such as the number of small <br />shipments, an increase in the number of "empty" miles, increased idling due to traffic congestion, etc. This <br />analysis focuses only on the technological improvements possible to heavy duty vehicles and engines. <br />There are numerous regulatory and voluntary mechanisms currently being pursued to reduce emissions from <br />heavy duty trucks. For example, EPA has established rules related to both diesel fuel and heavy duty engines, as <br />has the California Air Resources Board. The Washington State Department of Ecology is pursuing several <br />strategies to reduce diesel emissions, including retrofitting older diesel vehicles and an idle reduction campaign. <br />Thus far, these programs and regulations have focused primarily on the reduction of particulate matter and <br />nitrogen oxide emissions from heavy duty vehicles, although it is expected there will be corollary reductions in <br />greenhouse gas emissions. <br />While there is not a lot of research currently available on the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from <br />technological improvements to heavy duty vehicles, what research is available suggests reductions in the range <br />of 25-50%. These improvements include hybrid vehicle systems, aerodynamic and rolling resistance <br />improvements, and engine and fuel improvements, among other strategies. <br />While we do expect this area to yield significant benefits in the future, our current assumptions of these benefits <br />will remain conservative until further research supports a larger reduction potential, and are categorized into the <br />following two scenarios: <br />• Likely Scenario: 5% <br />This scenario is comprised of a fairly conservative assumption that an additional 5% reduction in greenhouse <br />gas emissions from technological improvements to heavy duty vehicles can be achieved in the Puget Sound <br />region by 2040. Given the aggressive strategies currently being pursued in Washington State and the Puget <br />Sound region related to diesel emissions, as well as activities being undertaken at the national level to reduce <br />emissions from heavy duty vehicles and diesel fuel, it is likely that a 5% additional reduction over the next 30 <br />years will be possible. <br />• Aggressive Scenario: 10% <br />This scenario is comprised of a more aggressive assumption that an additional 10% reduction in greenhouse <br />gas emissions from technological improvements to heavy duty vehicles can be achieved in the Puget Sound <br />region by 2040. Given all the reasons identified above we feel that 10% is an achievable target, but with the <br />L-6 <br />Appendix L: Climate Change Background <br />