My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014/07/16 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
2014/07/16 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 4:34:02 PM
Creation date
2/13/2020 11:13:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
7/16/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tacoma 2050: Medium Sea Level Rise Scenario, High Sea Level Rise Scenario <br />Tacoma 2100: Medium Sea Level Rise Scenario, High Sea Level Rise Scenario <br />Summary of Methodology <br />Mapping the sea level rise scenarios required using the command line window in an ArcMap project to analyze <br />LiDAR elevation data. Several commands were executed in order to select the areas of land that are below the <br />threshold height and above the ordinary high water, and are also hydrologically connected to the Puget Sound. <br />This approach does not take into account local morphodynamic conditions, which would be necessary to analyze <br />the vulnerability of a specific site to sea level rise. <br />Constraints <br />The sea level rise map products in this report resulting from the UWCIG/Ecology sea level rise estimates and the <br />LiDAR data should not be used to evaluate whether specific sites or properties will experience impacts or <br />inundation. The purpose of these maps is to give a broad picture of what sea level rise may potentially look like in <br />the areas most likely to be affected by inundation. One way to do a more detailed analysis of the impacts of sea <br />level rise on a facility of high importance would be to install a global positioning system (GPS) unit to accurately <br />measure the vertical land movement on that particular site. In addition to tectonic forces, local vertical land <br />movement can also be caused by sediment compaction, which could also be monitored by a GPS unit. <br />Additionally, a site- and use -specific survey would be necessary to determine precisely accurate elevation data. <br />The following sections explain the constraints inherent in the mapping methodology, the sea level rise estimates <br />and the LiDAR data. The purpose of these sections is to transparently identify the limitations of the resulting maps <br />and to emphasize that the maps should be interpreted with these limitations in mind. <br />Mapping Methodology: Much of the Puget Sound shoreline terrain is comprised of steep slopes and bluffs. The <br />sea level rise maps do not depict potential impacts to these types of areas. The mapping methodology purely <br />portrays the increased elevation of the ordinary high water sea level (long-term inundation) and, in the case of <br />Seattle, episodic storm surge; it does not illustrate the dynamic changes that will be associated with different <br />types of topographies, such as "erosion of beaches and bluffs, landward migration (translation) of barrier beaches <br />... and loss of many marshes and wetlands" (Johannessen and MacLennan 2007). Steeply sloped areas that do <br />not appear to be impacted by sea level rise on the maps may be affected by these other processes. Additionally, <br />the maps that depict possible sea level rise coupled with extreme event storm surge do not take into account the <br />inland impact from sea spray. <br />Sea Level Rise Estimates: The January 2008 UWCIG/Ecology report, "Sea Level Rise in the Coastal Waters of <br />Washington State," emphasizes that: <br />"(1) these calculations have not formally quantified the probabilities, (2) SLR [sea level rise] <br />cannot be estimated accurately at specific locations, and (3) these numbers are for advisory <br />purposes and are not actual predictions." <br />Therefore the estimates are not appropriate for site specific analysis and should be interpreted with <br />caution. <br />LiDAR: Considerable care has been taken to ensure that these data are as accurate as possible. We <br />believe most of the data is adequate for determination of flood hazards, for hydrologic modeling, for <br />determination of slope angles, and similar uses with a level of detail appropriate to a horizontal scale of <br />1:12,000 (1 inch = 1,000 feet) or smaller and vertical accuracy on the order of a foot. Locally, the data is <br />of considerably poorer quality. Users should carefully determine the place -to -place accuracy and fitness <br />of these data for your particular purposes. For many purposes a site- and use -specific field survey will be <br />necessary. For more complete metadata, see Appendix C or visit the Puget Sound LiDAR Consortium <br />website at pugetsoundlidar.ess.washington.edu. <br />Mapped Scenarios Summary <br />As illustrated in Exhibits 1-10, the waterfront, river delta and tideflat areas in the region experience some level of <br />inundation under these sea level rise scenarios. There are numerous planning implications to these results, <br />L-17 <br />Appendix L: Climate Change Background <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.