My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014/07/16 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
2014/07/16 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 4:34:02 PM
Creation date
2/13/2020 11:13:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
7/16/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
area will face major impacts. Damage to structures, power outages to the immediate and surrounding areas, <br />sewer system back-ups, water supply disruption and the closure of major transportation facilities, including State <br />Route167 and Interstate 5, are some of the likely impacts (Bissonnette 2009). <br />The area and the region will face economic impacts as well as physical impacts. The Green River Valley is the <br />West Coast's second-largest manufacturing and distribution center and has $46 million of economic activity per <br />day (2006) (Gregg 9/18/09). As a result of the threat of flooding, businesses in the affected area have not been <br />able to purchase private flood insurance and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood insurance <br />coverage is not sufficient for many industrial companies' assets (Gregg 9/18/09). Additionally, the Kent Valley has <br />seen higher than usual industrial usage vacancy rates even with a lowered threat of flooding (PSBJ 12/23/09). <br />King County faces considerable costs to relocate or protect major facilities, including the District Court, Animal <br />Shelter, Regional Justice Center, King County Elections office, and several Public Health Clinics (Bissonnette <br />2009). <br />Howard Hanson Dam: Coordination and Planning Efforts <br />Many agencies joined forces to plan for the potential flooding of the Green River Valley. The agencies involved <br />included the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the National Weather Service, the U.S. Geological Survey, <br />Washington State Emergency Management, the Washington State Department of Transportation, King County <br />Flood Services and Emergency Management, King County and Seattle Public Health agencies, the City of <br />Auburn, the City of Kent, the City of Renton, the City of Seattle, and the City of Tukwila. Planning and <br />coordination activities included preparing for inundation scenarios, the completion of levee repairs, <br />communication among jurisdictions, as well as the protection or relocation of major government buildings in the <br />area. <br />King County, in coordination with Puget Sound Energy, the Red Cross and others, also launched a public <br />awareness campaign for residents and business owners to prepare for the flood including flood planning <br />resources, evacuation routes, free sandbags and free pesticide collection. Each of the cities at risk also reached <br />out to their residents and business owners with emergency preparation and evacuation information. In addition, <br />King County collaborated with other agencies to create a new four phase flood alert system that provides real- <br />time messages to subscribers. <br />Other Adaptation Planning Efforts <br />In addition to the work being conducted by Ecology as mentioned previously in this report, several jurisdictions in <br />the central Puget Sound region are researching and/or pursuing policy related to climate change adaptation. King <br />County is probably the most active in this area, and one example of their work is the 2008 report "Vulnerability of <br />Major Wastewater Facilities to Flooding from Sea -Level Rise." Specific to transportation, there is also an eight - <br />county Regional Catastrophic Preparedness Planning Project working on the development of a transportation <br />recovery plan to identify disruptions in the transportation network and methods to prioritize rerouting needs in the <br />event of a catastrophic disaster. <br />Climate change is also beginning to be addressed in the evaluation of major transportation projects, both in terms <br />of reducing greenhouse gas emissions but also in terms of adaptation. Examples of projects incorporating <br />consideration of a changing climate in their planning work include the Columbia River Crossing project on the <br />border between Oregon and Washington, which included considerations related to the design of the bridge should <br />the high water levels of the Columbia River rise in the future. The 1-90 Snoqualmie Pass East project considered <br />increased flow rates in streams and designed bridges to accommodate higher flows. Another example is the Tolt <br />Bridge in King County, which was designed to withstand high flows and major flooding of the Snoqualmie River. <br />SECTION 6: ADAPTATION PLANNING FOR TRANSPORTATION — FUTURE WORK <br />This section of the paper briefly discusses the possibilities for incorporating adaptation to climate change in the <br />long-range transportation planning process. This is an emerging area of study, and as such this paper does not <br />attempt to provide definitive guidance at this time on how adaptation should be incorporated into either long-range <br />transportation planning or in the design of individual projects. However, a discussion of some general categories <br />of potential strategies and planning approaches to address the issue is included, as well as potential future <br />research and collaboration needs. <br />L-20 <br />Appendix L: Climate Change Background <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.