Laserfiche WebLink
21: NORTHWEST <br />Averaged over the region, the number of days with more <br />than one inch of precipitation is projected to increase 13% in <br />2041 to 2070 compared with 1971 to 2000 under a scenario <br />that assumes a continuation of current rising emissions trends <br />(A2),10 though these projections are not consistent across <br />models.28 This increase in heavy downpours could increase <br />flood risk in mixed rain -snow and rain -dominant basins, and <br />could also increase stormwater management challenges in <br />urban areas. <br />Consequences and Likelihoods of Changes <br />Reservoir systems have multiple objectives, including irrigation, <br />municipal and industrial use, hydropower production, flood <br />control, and preservation of habitat for aquatic species. <br />Modeling studies indicate, with near 100% likelihood and for <br />all emissions scenarios, that reductions in summer flow will <br />occur by 2050 in basins with significant snowmelt (for example, <br />Elsner et al. 201024). These reduced flows will require more <br />tradeoffs among objectives of the whole system of reservoirs,30 <br />especially with the added challenges of summer increases <br />in electric power demand for cooling31 and additional water <br />consumption by crops and forests.'°'32 For example, reductions <br />in hydropower production of as much as 20% by the 2080s <br />could be required to preserve in -stream flow targets for fish <br />in the Columbia River basin.33 Springtime irrigation diversions <br />increased between 1970 and 2007 in the Snake River basin, as <br />earlier snowmelt led to reduced spring soil moisture.34 In the <br />absence of human adaptation, annual hydropower production <br />is much more likely to decrease than to increase in the Columbia <br />River basin; economic impacts of hydropower changes could <br />be hundreds of millions of dollars per year.35 <br />Region -wide summer temperature increases and, in certain <br />basins, increased river flooding and winter flows and <br />decreased summer flows, will threaten many freshwater <br />species, particularly salmon, steelhead, and trout.27 Rising <br />temperatures will increase disease and/or mortality in several <br />iconic salmon species, especially for spring/summer Chinook <br />and sockeye in the interior Columbia and Snake River basins.36 <br />Some Northwest streams30 and lakes have already warmed <br />over the past three decades, contributing to changes such as <br />earlier Columbia River sockeye salmon migration37 and earlier <br />blooms of algae in Lake Washington.38 Relative to the rest of <br />the United States, Northwest streams dominated by snowmelt <br />runoff appear to be less sensitive, in the short term, to warming <br />due to the temperature buffering provided by snowmelt and <br />groundwater contributions to those streams.39 However, as <br />snowpack declines, the future sensitivity to warming is likely to <br />increase in these areas.48 By the 2080s, suitable habitat for the <br />four trout species of the interior western U.S. is projected to <br />decline 47% on average, compared to the period 1978-1997.41 <br />As species respond to climate change in diverse ways, there is <br />potential for ecological mismatches to occur — such as in the <br />timing of the emergence of predators and their prey.38 <br />Adaptive Capacity and Implications for Vulnerability <br />The ability to adapt to climate changes is strengthened <br />by extensive water resources infrastructure, diversity of <br />institutional arrangements,42 and management agencies that <br />are responsive to scientific input. However, over -allocation <br />of existing water supply, conflicting objectives, limited <br />management flexibility caused by rigid water allocation and <br />operating rules, and other institutional barriers to changing <br />operations continue to limit progress towards adaptation in <br />many parts of the Columbia River basin.43'44 Vulnerability to <br />projected changes in snowmelt timing is probably highest in <br />basins with the largest hydrologic response to warming and <br />lowest management flexibility — that is, fully allocated, mid - <br />elevation, temperature -sensitive, mixed rain -snow watersheds <br />with existing conflicts among users of summer water. Regional <br />power planners have expressed concerns over the existing <br />hydroelectric system's potential inability to provide adequate <br />summer electricity given the combination of climate change, <br />demand growth, and operating constraints.' Vulnerability <br />is probably lowest where hydrologic change is likely to be <br />smallest (in rain -dominant basins) and where institutional <br />arrangements are simple and current natural and human <br />demands rarely exceed current water availability.43,45,46 <br />The adaptive capacity of freshwater ecosystems also varies <br />and, in managed basins, will depend on the degree to which <br />U.S. GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH PROGRAM <br />491 CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS IN THE UNITED STATES <br />