My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014/07/16 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2014
>
2014/07/16 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2023 4:34:02 PM
Creation date
2/13/2020 11:13:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
7/16/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The stopping time for climate change, like the stopping time for a car, is longer the faster your vehicle <br />plummets toward its doom. And the longer we wait, and the more severe the climate damage, the longer the <br />stopping time. Waiting until ecosystems are collapsing at the end of the 21 st century would impose <br />something like a century more of stopping distance. And the continued ecosystem damage during that 100 <br />years of extra stopping period would create even more havoc, pushing more species past their extreme <br />limits, and pulling more ecosystem services out from under the human economy, as one species after <br />another slammed up against its ecological limits. Even a controlled braking couldn't save our metaphorical <br />car from a shattering accident. Remember: even a teenager knows to stop before skidding. <br />The good news is that by applying the brakes, our civilization might arrive at a gentle non -skidding halt. The <br />bad news is that, if we don't, we will exhaust the ability of the Earth to pay the climate tax by 2100, and after <br />that the world will collapse ecologically. <br />A reasonable timeline for action looks like this. First, set a goal to plateau atmospheric CO2 levels by 2100 <br />because if we do not, then climate meltdown is likely to ensue. Second, to achieve this goal, CO2 emissions <br />need to drop to low levels by 2050. That gives us 35 years to replace most fossil fuels with renewabies— <br />about 3 percent replacement a year and another 2 percent increase for economic growth. Is 5 percent <br />higher renewable power each year achievable? This is the challenge we face to bring climate change effects <br />to a screeching halt. And that is the challenge that the political, social, technical, and financial sectors of our <br />society should take up. <br />Stephen R. Palumbi is the Jane and Marshall Steel Professor of Biology at Stanford University. He is <br />a Senior Fellow with the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment and the Director of Stanford's <br />Hopkins Marine Station in Monterey working on the way marine species adapt to climate variation. He <br />and Tony Palumbi are co-authors of the recent book Extreme Life of the Sea (Princeton University Press). <br />[1 ] Van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., ... & Rose, S. K. <br />(2011). The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change, 109(1-2), 5-31. <br />Stephen R. Palumbi <br />Jane and Marshall Steel Professor of Biology, Stanford University; Director, Hopkins Marine Station, Monterey <br />@spalumbi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.