Laserfiche WebLink
Dr, Hong Li JN 12084 <br /> May 10, 2012 Page 6 <br /> use the slurry method if caving soil is encountered. Excessive ground loss in the drilled <br /> holes must be avoided to reduce the potential for settlement on the surrounding ground. If <br /> water is present in a hole at the time the soldier pile is poured, concrete must be tremied to <br /> the bottom of the hole. <br /> The upper, very loose soil downslope of the wall would then be removed to a shallow depth <br /> of about 5 feet. As excavation proceeds downward, the space between the piles should be <br /> lagged with timber, and any voids behind the timbers should be filled with pea gravel, or a <br /> slurry comprised of sand and fly ash. Treated lagging is usually required for permanent <br /> walls, while untreated lagging can often be utilized for temporary shoring walls. Temporary <br /> vertical cuts will be necessary between the soldier piles for the lagging placement. The <br /> prompt and careful installation of lagging is important, particularly in loose or caving soil, to <br /> maintain the integrity of the excavation and provide safer working conditions. Additionally, <br /> care must be taken by the excavator to remove no more soil between the soldier piles than <br /> is necessary to install the lagging. Caving or overexcavation during lagging placement <br /> could result in loss of ground. Timber lagging should be designed for an applied lateral <br /> pressure of 30 percent of the design wall pressure, if the pile spacing is less than three pile <br /> diameters. For larger pile spacings, the lagging should be designed for 50 percent of the <br /> design load. <br /> Shallow failures would still be possible, and failure of the soil beneath the wood lagging <br /> would also be possible,and would likely result in some minor ground loss above the wall. If <br /> this occurs, the lagging would need to be extended down to the resulting ground surface, <br /> and the resulting voids behind the wall backfilled. To minimize the effect of this ground loss, <br /> the native, fine grained sand should not be used as backfill material. <br /> Soldier Pile Wall Design <br /> Soldier pile walls thatare cantilevered or restrained by one row of tiebacks, and that has a <br /> level backslope, should be designed for an active soil pressure equal to that pressure <br /> exerted by an equivalent fluid with a unit weight of 45 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). This <br /> active pressure should be applied to a design height (H) equal to 10 feet. <br /> Lateral movement of the soldier piles below the active zone will be resisted by an ultimate <br /> passive soil pressure equal to that pressure exerted by a fluid with a density of 350 pcf. No <br /> safety factor is included in the given value. This soil pressure is valid only for a level slope <br /> of in front of the soldier pile; it acts on two times the grouted pile diameter, Any slopes <br /> resulting from ground loss in front of the wall would significantly decrease the passive <br /> resistance. The soldier piles should be embedded no less than 20 feet below the existing <br /> ground surface at the top of the slope. If slope failures occurring downslope of the wall <br /> expose a height greater than 10 feet or cause the soil beneath the 10 foot height, in front of <br /> the wall to be sloped, the wall will no longer be stable.. Installing remedial measures, such <br /> as tieback anchors or longer piles, could be needed at that point. <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as <br /> they existed at the time of our texploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions <br /> encountered in the test borings are representative of subsurface conditions on the site.. If the <br /> subsurface conditions encountered during construction are significantly different from those <br /> GEOTECH CONSULTANTS. INC.. <br />