Laserfiche WebLink
Impact on Everett's Maximum Regular Levy Rate—The creation of an RFA would reduce Everett's maximum <br /> regular levy rate by the amount of the RFA levy rate. <br /> An RFA funded by property tax would have a maximum levy rate of$1.50. Under an RFA funded by property <br /> tax,the City's maximum levy rate would be$2.325 if the RFA was at its maximum rate. <br /> An RFA funded by a combination of property tax and a fire benefit charge would have a maximum levy rate of <br /> $1.00. Under this funding structure,the City's maximum regular levy rate would be$2.825. <br /> Everett's projected regular levy rate for 2020 is$1.90. <br /> RFA Levy Rate—If the RFA was funded by just property tax, its maximum levy rate of$1.50 would generate <br /> approximately$30,130,000, based on Everett's 2020 assessed value. This amount exceeds the 2020 cost of <br /> fire services, less the net cost of Fire Inspections, by$7.5 million. However,the RFA would not be required to <br /> impose its maximum rate initially. The initial levy rate would be a key decision point in the establishment of <br /> an RFA. <br /> If the RFA is funded by a combination of property tax and a fire benefit charge,the maximum levy rate of <br /> $1.00 would generate $20,087,000 based on Everett's 2020 assessed value. The remainder would be funded <br /> by the FBC. However,the RFA could choose to fund a greater portion of its operating costs- up to 60%- by <br /> the FBC and impose a lower property tax levy rate. <br /> Regular Levy Concessions—Similar to the Sno-Isle merger, the City may need to consider possible concessions <br /> in its regular property tax levy in order to achieve voter approval to create the RFA. <br /> If the City were to make no concessions on its regular levy, adding$1.50(the maximum rate for a property <br /> tax-only RFA)to Everett's tax role would cost a homeowner of a median value property an additional$584 per <br /> year, based on Everett's 2020 assessed value. Under the combined property tax/FBC funding structure, the <br /> maximum rate of$1.00 would cost the same homeowner an additional $389 per year, plus the Fire Benefit <br /> Charge. <br /> If the City were to reduce its levy rate by the RFA's full$1.50 levy rate, it would increase the General <br /> Government deficit by$7.7 million, based on the 2020 forecast. <br /> The cities of Kent and Lynnwood formed RFA's with existing fire districts. Both cities chose to initially reduce <br /> their regular levy rates by amounts that were less than the initial levy rates of the new RFAs. In both cases, <br /> taxpayers paid more in property tax to form the RFAs. Kent consumed its banked capacity in the following <br /> year. To date, Lynnwood has consumed about 30%of the banked capacity it created through the formation of <br /> the RFA. <br /> Impact on the Structural Deficit—The amount of deficit reduction would depend on the level of regular levy <br /> concession that the City would offer to promote voter approval. A table showing the incremental dollar value <br /> of levy rates based on the City 2020 Assessed Value is provided on page 9. <br /> Impact on Median Value Property Homeowner—The cost to a median value residential property owner would <br /> depend on the taxing structure of the new entity and the amount of concession the City offered on its regular <br /> levy. A table showing the incremental cost increases a median value residential property is provided on page <br /> 8. <br /> mil <br /> LI Alternative Service Delivery/Funding Models Wage <br />