My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1802 RUCKER AVE 2020-03-09
>
Address Records
>
RUCKER AVE
>
1802
>
1802 RUCKER AVE 2020-03-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2020 11:49:28 AM
Creation date
3/9/2020 11:48:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RUCKER AVE
Street Number
1802
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: Jeff Heilman <br /> Subject: Follow up question: 1802 Rucker Ave <br /> Hello Jeff. I stopped in last week to submit plans for our garage project and we chatted a bit about the areas we need to <br /> update. Thanks for taking the time to review and give feedback.( I have inserted the drawings for your reference here <br /> since I am sure you see hundreds of them and it's hard to recall the particular situation we discussed O) <br /> I spent some time w/the architect talking about the alley overhang situation in particular. Couple of things he used in <br /> creating the plans—namely Chapter 2 of the IBC (definitions) under fire separation distance—seems like it's <br /> relevant to the current design proposal. The code says when looking at fire separation along an alley or roadway <br /> you use the distance between the building and the centerline of the roadway or alley and not the property line. This <br /> should indicate we can leave garage with proposed overhang without issue doesn't it? <br /> The other interesting circumstance of course is that there is no full clarity on where the property line so the alley <br /> location is somewhat of a best guess here. Given that there is a certified building on the site, and that the proposed <br /> overhang is exactly what it is on the current building, along w/the below referenced IBC code, it seems like the plans as <br /> proposed should be acceptable? <br /> Thanks for taking time to review this topic. <br /> Chapter 2 of the IBC (definitions) under fire separation distance: <br /> FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE. The distance measured from the buildi <br /> 1 . The closest interior lot line. <br /> 2. To the centerline of a street, an alley or public way. <br /> 3. To an imaginary line between two buildings on the lot. The distance sh <br /> face of the wall. <br /> http://codes.iccsafe.org/app/book/content/2015-I-Codes/2015%201 BC%2OHTML/Chapter%202.html <br /> 3//i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.