Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> I Subsurjace Fxploration, Geobgic Hau+rd, and <br /> Sho-/sle Skil/s CenterAddidon PreUminary Gectechnical Er+gineering Report <br /> Eventt. Washington GeoJogic Harords and Mitigations <br /> ITherefore, the flow length within a temporary sediment control trap or pond has virtually no <br /> effect on the water qualiry of the discharge since it is not going to settle out of suspension in <br /> I the time it takes to flow from one end of the pond to the other. Reduction of turbidity from a <br /> construction site is almost entirely a function of cover measures and flow control. Temporary <br /> � sed'unent Vaps and ponds aze necessary to control the release rate of the runoff and w provide <br /> � a catchment for sand-sized and lazger soil particles, but aze very ineffective at reducing the <br /> twbidity of the runoff. <br /> ISilt fencing should be utilized as buffer protection and not as a flow-control measure. Silt <br /> fencing is meant to be placed pazallel with topographic contours to prevent sediment-laden <br /> I runoff from leaving a work azea or entering a sensitive area. Silt feaces should not be placed <br /> to cross contour lines without having sepazate flow control in front of the silt fence. A <br /> swale/berm combination should be conswcted to provide flow control rather than let tt►e <br /> � runoff build up behind tt►e silt fence and utilize the silt fence as the flow-control measure. <br /> Runoff flowing in front of a silt fence will cause additional erosion and usually will cause a <br /> failure of the silt fence. Improperly installed silt fencing 6as the potential to cause a much <br /> I lazger erosion hazard than if the silt fence was not installed at all. The use of silt fencing <br /> should be limited to protect sensitive azeas, and swales should be used to provide flow control. <br /> ( 7.1 Erosion Hazard MitiAation <br /> � To mitigate the erosion hazards and potential for off-site sediment transport, we would <br /> recommend the following: <br /> � 1. 1'he winter performance of a site is dependent on a well-conceived plan for control of <br /> site erosion and storm water runoff. It is easier to keep the soil on the ground than to <br /> remove it from storm water. The owner and the design team should include adequate <br /> I ground-cover measures, access roads, and staging azeas in che project bid to give the <br /> selected contractor a workable site. The selected conuactor needs to be prepazed to <br /> implement and maintain the required measures to reduce the amount of exposed <br /> I ground. A site maintenance plan should be in place in the event storm water turbidiry <br /> measurements are greater than the Ecology standazds. <br /> � 2. All TESC measures for a given azea to be graded or otherwise worked should be <br /> instalied prior to any activiry within an azea other than installing the TESC features or <br /> timber hazvesting. The re�ommended sequence of construction witLin a given azea <br /> � after timber hazvesting would be to install sediment traps and/or ponds and establish <br /> perimeter flow control prior to starting mass grading. <br /> I3. During the wetter months of the year, or when lazge storm events are predicted during <br /> the summer months, each work azea should be stabilized so that if showers occur, the <br /> Iwork area can receive the rainfali without excessive erosion or sediment uansport. The <br /> ��Q�� Z� ASSOCIA7ED E1RTN SCI6NCES,/NC. <br /> � EG/Id-EE090113A5-Pro1�t12Q'N02131EE1WP �e g ,' <br />