Laserfiche WebLink
October 14,2015 <br /> Project No.T-6116-2 <br /> ibsurface <br /> In our opinion, with impervious pavement extending to the building perimeter, dock high floor elevations and <br /> surface drainage controlled and directed away from the structures, installation of perimeter foundation drains <br /> would not be necessary. <br /> Infiltration <br /> The glacial till soils composed of silty sand characteristically exhibits low permeability and would not be a <br /> suitable receptor soil for discharge of development stormwater using infiltration/retention facilities. Conventional <br /> stormwater detention with controlled release to the drainage basin should be used to manage development <br /> stormwater. <br /> 5.9 Utilities <br /> Utility pipes should be bedded and backfilled in accordance with American Public Works Association(APWA)or <br /> the City of Everett specifications. As a minimum, trench backfill should be placed and compacted as structural <br /> fill, as described in Section 5.2 of this report. As noted, most native soils excavated on the site should be suitable <br /> for use as backfill material during dry weather conditions. However, if utility construction takes place during the <br /> wet winter months, it will likely be necessary to import suitable wet weather fill for utility trench backfilling. <br /> 0 Pavements <br /> Ivements should be constructed on subgrades prepared as described in Section 5.2 of this report. Regardless of <br /> the relative compaction achieved, the subgrade must be firm and relatively unyielding before paving. The <br /> subgrade should be proofrolled with heavy construction equipment to verify this condition. <br /> The thickness of the various components of the pavement depends not only on the subgrade soils, but also the <br /> traffic loading conditions to which the pavement will be subjected. For design, we have assumed the traffic <br /> loading can be represented by design 18-kip equivalent single axle loads (ESALs) of 85,000 for light traffic and <br /> 430,000 for heavy traffic areas. These ESALs represent traffic loading equivalent to 5 and 25, loaded (80,000 <br /> pound gross vehicle weight) tractor-trailer rigs, respectively, traversing the pavement per day over a 20-year <br /> design life. If heavier traffic loading or volumes are expected,we should reevaluate the following recommended <br /> pavement sections: <br /> Light Traffic: <br /> • Two inches of hot mix asphalt (HMA) over four inches of crushed rock base (CRB) or four <br /> inches full depth HMA <br /> Heavy Traffic: <br /> • Three inches of HMA over six inches of CRB or six inches full depth HMA <br /> =e paving materials used should conform to the current Washington State Department of Transportation <br /> 4✓SDOT)specifications for V2-inch hot mix asphalt(HMA)surfacing and CRB. <br /> Page No. 11 <br />