Laserfiche WebLink
MCOB, PHASE II <br /> Calculation: C-2 Page 2 <br /> WEIR WALL HEIGHT <br /> Design Basis: <br /> The project will replace the existing flow splitters. The new flow splitters will use a weir wall to restrict the <br /> flows from exiting the Merrill Creek outfall pipe until the flows are greater than the water quality flowrate at <br /> which point they will start to spill over a weir wall and exit out the outfall pipe. <br /> The weir wall elevation correlates to a water surface elevation expected in the system at the water quality <br /> storm event. This elevation was calculated to be equal to the Energy Grade Line elevation in each flow <br /> splitter structure when the water quality flowrate is entering the system and taking into account backwater <br /> effects. <br /> Methods and Assumptions: <br /> The Energy Grade Line was calculated using the Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 22,Third Edition <br /> (HEC-22)methodology which allows for more accurate evaluations when pipes are not expected to be <br /> flowing full. The energy grade line was calculated up the mainline including the flow splitters only. All <br /> flow coming into the system from upstream branches was included. <br /> The water quality flow rate was used for the Q as calculated in calculation C-1 Water Quality Flowrates. <br /> The following software was used for this calculation: <br /> - Flowmaster was used to calculate some of the values used in the table. <br /> Assumptions: <br /> Manning's n=0.012 <br /> Findings and Conclusions: <br /> The Energy Grade Line elevation within each flow splitter corresponds to the calculated water elevation <br /> when the water quality flowrate is entering the system. <br /> Top of Weir Wall Elevations <br /> Structure EGLa(Energy Grade Line)=top of weir wall, <br /> from Column(16),Table A <br /> CB 6 427.99 <br /> CB 5 423.60 <br /> CB 4 422.93 <br /> CB 3 422.07 <br /> CB 2 421.80 <br />