Laserfiche WebLink
r i <br /> on the list for each surface type. Infeasibility must be demonstrated accordiing to the infeasibility list in the <br /> manual for each BMP which is not selected. Based on the geotechnical report it appears that permeable <br /> pavement could be a viable option unless the soil types do not accommodate its use. Note that a geotechnical <br /> engineer's determination that soils will not infiltrate is no longer an ac eptable demonstration of in{{�easi ility <br /> unless appropriate infiltration testing is performed. / 7t - 7rovtof..act A ectt <br /> • The drainage report notes that a wet vault with 5.2 feet of dead s(orage will be used to 6rovide water quality <br /> treatment. Presumably this was intended to mean the pond shown in the southwest corner of the site. <br /> However,the plans indicate that the invert of the pond outlet is less than one foot above the bottom of the <br /> pond which will not provide adequate dead storage. If the intent was to use the stand pipe to control the water <br /> level and provide the required dead storage the pond will back water into the detention vaults. In this case any <br /> portion of the vaults below the stand pipe overflow elevation (438.14)cannot be counted toward the detention <br /> storage requirement. Since the detention pipe invert(435.70) is approximately 2.5 feet below the V <br /> overflow elevation nearly half of the detention pipe cannot be counted as detention. r e v y+e 5 s <br /> • The stormwater facilities must comply with the requirements contained in the Design and Construction <br /> Standards and Specifications (DCSS). Most notably, access and fencing must be provided in accordance with ety <br /> Section 4-4.2 and the additional requirements in Section 4-4.1(2) if the City will maintain the facilities. ro°i <br /> V The city will not maintain CMP detention tanks without the approval of the City Engineer(DCSS 4-4.1(2)-1) <br /> • The wetpond must comply with the setback requirements in DCSS Section 4-4.1(3) includingr- a 10 foot s back <br /> from property lines,and any additional setback requirements per the Zoning Code. Pro v, <br /> • The wetpond must be designed in accordance with the applicable standards included in the Stormwater <br /> Management Manual, including a two celled configuration. Provide calculations in accordance with the manual <br /> demonstrating that adequate flow path is provided. --(3‘,/ ct d <br /> Erik Emerson PE <br /> City of Everett, Public Works <br /> Senior Surface Water Engineer <br /> eemerson@everettwa.gov <br /> In addition, Planning has commented that the wet pond cannot take the place of the required landscaping buffer to be <br /> located in the front 20' setback and the 5' side setback. If this facility will be vegetated to include water based plants <br /> that meet the Type III landscaping requirements,then the pond can encroach into the front setback. However if there <br /> will not be plants located in the pond, it must be relocated outside of the required setbacks per the Zoning Code. Grace <br /> Pollard in the Planning Department can answer any questions regarding these requirements (GPollard@everettwa.gov, <br /> 425-257-8807). <br /> Thanks, <br /> Sabrina Fandler, EIT, LEED®AP BD+C <br /> City of Everett Public Works Department Development Technician <br /> 3200 Cedar St, Everett, WA 98201 <br /> Office: 425-257-8810 <br /> Direct: 425-257-7813 <br /> Email: SFandler(W)everettwa.gov <br /> liffaWitir <br /> The Permit Services Counter is located on the 2nd Floor. <br /> Hours of Operation: Monday-Friday 7:30am-12:00pm and 1:OOpm-4:OOpm. <br />