|
•
<br /> Reform 1St re o r m s us. These charts break down the difference between
<br /> reformist reforms which continue or expand the reach of
<br /> abolitionist steps in policin
<br /> policing,and abolish ist mpacts swehat strk ut chip away
<br /> g and reduce its overall impact.As we struggle to
<br /> decrease the power of policing there are also positive
<br /> and pro-active investments we can make in community
<br /> health and well-being.
<br /> reduce funding reduce tools/tactics/challenge the notion that reduce the scale (✓'
<br /> DOES THIS... / technology police have
<br /> \ to police? police increase safety? at their disposal? of policing?
<br /> INCREASES BodyINCREASES.Body cameras are 41141ki
<br /> INCREASES.Equipping NO.Body cameras are based on the idea that police who
<br /> PF s pitched as making police cameras provide the police do not use'excessive force"are
<br /> police officers 'body with another tool,increasingless threatens But lice can
<br /> BODYmore accountable, g police
<br /> cameras will require increasinggone idea that surveillanceoicbd tst increasingquieloin off body cameras and,when
<br /> CAMERAS more money going poking,done'right,' police can to acquire used.of footage c me often doesn't havee
<br /> toward police budgets. makes people safe. more gadgets. the Impact that communitytig It. "
<br /> members want,or is used for
<br /> surveillance
<br /> NO.Advocates of NO.This is based on the NO.More community police
<br /> community policing argue belief that policing is INCREASES.Cops are means that the scale of
<br /> COMMUNITY that departments will have focused on keeping People trained in additional policing will increase,
<br /> safe,end the violence of
<br /> POLICING tohiremorecopsmbein tactics and approaches. particularlyoneighborhoods,in Black, when
<br /> "breakdisn oftr bye
<br /> neighborhoods and in the "breakdown oftrust'with
<br /> poor where
<br /> community. the community. there is perceived"mistrust" 101111
<br /> NO.This will increase the
<br /> NO.This furthers the belief P.
<br /> NO.More training will scope of policing,given the type
<br /> require more funding and that better training would of training.For instance,some O
<br /> MOREsensure that we can rely on advacete for police to be trained N
<br /> resources going to police police for safety,and that INCREASES all of these. on how to respond to mental U
<br /> TRAINING to develop and run instances of poke harm and heath crises,furthering the idea • C
<br /> oc trainings. violence moor tux of that police are the go to for every tyre.,
<br /> lash
<br /> lack straining kindd oof problem. N
<br /> NO.In some cases,there NO.Overseeing the police NO.Some argue for Civilian NO.This further entrenches TO
<br /> would be an increase through a board presumes that Review Boards'with teeth,'the policing as a legitimate,
<br /> CIVILIAN REVIEW/ cases of excessive force,killing. power to make decision and take reformable system with a +=(0
<br /> OVERSIGHT funding,whereas in other tying,planting false information, away policing tools and tactics. 'community'mandate.Some U
<br /> co cases,there would be no etc.are exceptional ourences However,a board with that level of boards,tasked with overseeing reBOARDS change. rather than part of the defy power has never existed despite then%bacome structurallyla
<br /> violence of policing. 50+years of organizing for them invested in than existence. a
<br /> rp
<br /> a
<br /> afik O
<br /> 'SAIL KILLER NO.Indwidualteing police NO.This reinforces the prison V'
<br /> COPS": violence creates a false distinction NO.Often,media attention industrial complex by d'
<br /> NO.Prosecuting police between'good police'(who keep us in high profile cases leads portraying killer/corrupt cope as a
<br /> PROSECUTE does not lead to changes sale),and'bad police'(who are to more resources and 'bad apples'rather than part of e O
<br /> POLICE WHO HAVE in olice funding or resourcing unusualllengng the ratherpen cameras and including body ardeintnrem of stheidea that
<br /> rp
<br /> KILLED police. challenging.sesk assumptionthan
<br /> that egular r systestheiolence, OLE, at
<br /> Pcameras "Veining."
<br /> AND ABUSED policing creates safety or examining prosecution and prison carve W
<br /> CIVILIANS. policing as systemic violence real justice U
<br /> Z
<br /> F
<br /> to
<br /> U
<br /> reduce tools/tactics/ LIJ
<br /> reduce funding challenge the notion that reduce the scale cr
<br /> DOES THIS... ) technology police have
<br /> to police? police increase safety? of policing? J
<br /> at their disposal? p g• Q
<br /> U_
<br /> YES. can INCREASE YES.Access to paid YES.The less financial F
<br /> SUSPEND THE YES.It challenges the notion support for police CC
<br /> USE OF PAID community-based that policing violence,and administrative leave lessens undergoing , 0
<br /> ADMINISTRATIVE budgets as municipalitiesthe consequences of use of investigation for killing
<br /> the me,administratives costs it force,andpresumes the s s
<br /> LEAVE FOR COPS no longer pay for incums,are essential risks of end exessive use of
<br /> harm a against right of police to use
<br /> UNDER policing'sb creating'safety.' force,the less support
<br /> INVESTIGATION community members. violence at all for policing.
<br /> WITHHOLD YES This can INCREASE VES.tt challenges the YFS.R reduces the ability ;I III ,
<br /> PENSIONS AND community-based notion that killings and of police forces to move
<br /> DON'T REHIRE budgets as municipalities excessive force are around or re-engage cops YES.
<br /> COPS INVOLVED IN no longer pay for exceptions,rather than known for their use of
<br /> policing's harm against the rule, violence.
<br /> EXCESSIVE community members.
<br /> FORCE
<br /> YES.This can INCREASE YES.It challenges the YES.Ft creates pressure for , ,
<br /> REQUIREnotion that policing and all IIII community-based police to account for their
<br /> COPS TO BE its costs are essential
<br /> budgets longer municipalities ,and limits
<br /> at eg leastifinancially,
<br /> LIABLE FOR no pay for components of safety. and limits legitimacy of YES.
<br /> MISCONDUCT policing's harm against Community members policing violence as
<br /> SETTLEMENTS community members. should not pay for its inevitable.
<br /> inevitable violence. ',
<br /> CAP YES This can INCREASE YES.It challenges the notion YES.Weapons trainings YES.This stops police -
<br /> OVERTIME community-based budgets that we need police to be and expos are used to scale from increasing c the,r
<br /> ACCRUAL since we won't have to pay trained for'counterterrorism" up policing infrastructure skillslegitimacy,capacity,blline"
<br /> ine in
<br /> forcopsake war how l and otherurvemanta action re as-the blueline'in ii+OT PAY FORry-stylo and shape goals for future order to expand their reach
<br /> better make war on our and surveillance in the guise tools,tactics,technolo
<br /> MILITARY communities. of increasingsty' over our daily lives and
<br /> EXERCISES community spaces.
<br /> YES.This can INCREASE YES.It challenges the notion YES.Weapons trainings YES.This stops police
<br /> WITHDRAW from increasing their ,
<br /> community-based budgets that we need police to be and expos are used to scale I sty
<br /> PARTICIPATION since we won't have to pay trained for"counterterrorism" up policing infrastructure esrt inc cy,capac ,and -
<br /> IN POLICE for cops learning how to and other military-style action and shape goals for future skills as-the blue line"in
<br /> MILITARIZATION better make war on our and surveillance in the guise tools,tactics,technology. order to expand their reach
<br /> PROGRAMS communities. of increasing"safety." over our daily community spaces.
<br /> es and
<br /> ces
<br /> PRIORITIZE YES.Prioritizin fundingYES.If we decrease YES.If we decrease III
<br /> II
<br /> YES.If we decrease 9
<br /> funding for policing,this resources also creates space funding for policing,this funding for policing,this
<br /> ON COMMUNITY will decrease its to imagine,team about,and will decrease the will decrease the size,
<br /> HEALTH, make resources that actually expansion of tools and scope and capacity of
<br /> EDUCATION, resources. create well-being. technolog systems of policing.
<br /> AFFORDABLE y Y
<br /> HOUSING
<br /> II • 'REDUCE THE
<br /> SIZE OF THE YES. YES. YES. I YES. I - I
<br /> POLICE FORCE /
<br />
|