Laserfiche WebLink
5 <br /> i. A parking strategy for the overall development with the understanding that each <br /> project/phase will look at the parking needs of that project/phase. <br /> j. Amendments to design standards and guidelines. The 2003 Design standards are <br /> proposed to be modified and the 2005 Design Guidelines replaced with newly drafted <br /> guidelines. • <br /> k. Removal of the requirement to have all residential off-street parking within an <br /> enclosed structure. <br /> 14.The Port has addressed the merits of each of the proposed amendments in written and <br /> graphic materials presented with and subsequent to filing of the application,and in public <br /> workshop/public hearing presentations to the Planning Commission. <br /> 15,The Port held a demonstration of the type of electronic changing message sign it proposes <br /> on November 20,2014 for a period of eight hours to demonstrate for the public the <br /> manner in which the sign was proposed to be operated. <br /> 16.The Planning Commission held public workshops on September 16,2014;November 4, <br /> 2014;a public hearing on the proposed amendments to the PDO master plan on <br /> December 2,2014 which was continued to December 16,2014. The December 2,2014, <br /> public hearing included a presentation of information by City staff related to the criteria <br /> for amendment to the PDO master plan,and a recommendation for approval of the <br /> overall PDO concept site plan amendments,subject to conditions to be incorporated into <br /> an Amendedand Restated Development Agreement. • - • ' -• . • - <br /> 17. Subsequent to the December 2,2014 Planning Commission public hearing and prior to <br /> the December 16,2014 continued public hearing,the Port formally withdrew its request <br /> for the electronic changing message sign. <br /> 18.Major amendments to a PDO master plan may only be made if they are found to be in the <br /> best long term interests of the community. <br /> 19.The City uses the following factors to determine if an amendment to an approved is in the <br /> • best long term interests of the community: <br /> o compatibility with surrounding properties <br /> o unique characteristics of the subject property <br /> o unique characteristics of the proposed use(s) <br /> o arrangement of buildings and open spaces as they relate to various uses within or <br /> adjacent to the planned development; <br /> o visual impact of the planned development upon the surrounding area; <br /> o public improvements proposed in connection with the planned development; <br /> 3 <br /> • <br /> 57 <br />