|
E ( z Z j,, to 3s-A vs S FIELD REPORT
<br /> I _ 1 of3)
<br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson
<br /> Y ...... ....... ......... .......... .......... ... ....... .... ........... ... .... ..,.... Report 143 revised
<br /> GeoDesign # Polygon-127-03 l./r° Date: 7/9/2019
<br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance ssues: i Permit:
<br /> I PW1505-005
<br /> Randy
<br /> A llen(City of Everett) John Feltner(Polygon) Weather: Overcast, 70's
<br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Arrival/De arture: 1130/1230
<br /> Distribution �. ... p
<br /> Kyler Meek(Polygon)
<br /> 1 Stephen Farnan(Polygon) Prepared By: Aubrey Hodgins
<br /> 0 Attachments: © Site Plan(s) © Density Test Summary Signature �J
<br /> ?`'r
<br /> ❑ Installation Records ❑ Other
<br /> Reviewed By: /,--',,r,,,,,, .,,u, ,,,,,,,„ ,
<br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Aubrey Hodgins, was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to
<br /> observe foundation subgrade for Lots 326 and 329.
<br /> Lots 26 and 2i
<br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed excavation of the foundation and crawl space area for Lots 326 and 329.
<br /> We noted that the exposed foundation subgrade generally consisted of a gray silty SAND with gravel that could be probed
<br /> less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. No over-excavation was necessary for Lot 326 or Lot 329.
<br /> Relative compaction of the exposed foundation subgrade was tested using a Troxler Moisture-Density gauge; in-place
<br /> density tests indicated that the exposed material had been generally compacted to 96% to 102% of its maximum dry density
<br /> as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis.
<br /> It is Our'optnion that`the exposed foundation subgrade observed..today for Lots 326 and 329 is currently'suitable`for support
<br /> of the untended structure.,-,A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1. The contractor was notified
<br /> of our observations prior to our departure from the site.
<br /> Lots 327, 332, 380, and 382:
<br /> The previously placed cement amended soil in Lots 327, 332, 380, and 382 was evaluated with a 1/2 inch diameter soil
<br /> probe and could generally be probed less than 1/2 inch. In our opinion, the cement amended soil in Lots 327, 332, 380,
<br /> and 382 has cured into a firm and unyielding cemented mass and is in general accordance with the project plans and our
<br /> geotechnical recommendations.
<br /> It is our opinion that the exposed foundation subgrade observed today for Lots 327, 332, 380, and 382 is currently suitable
<br /> for support of the intended structure. A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1. The contractor
<br /> was notified of our observations prior to our departure from the site.
<br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and
<br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees
<br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety. This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations. The report can only be considered
<br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section.
<br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900
<br /> 2502Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095
<br />
|