Laserfiche WebLink
GeoTest Services,Inc. December 9,2016 <br /> 3313 Oakes Avenue,Everett,WA Job No.16-0659 <br /> Groundwater <br /> For the purposes of this report, observed groundwater seepage represents either the <br /> existing surface of a groundwater table or the surface of perched seepage. The <br /> groundwater table is referred to as the atmospheric pressure surface that coincides with <br /> the top of the zone of saturation and is the surface that dictates the development design <br /> recommendations in this report. Perched seepage is referred to as a saturated zone that <br /> develops where a restrictive surface (i.e. dense, fine grained soils) limits the vertical, <br /> downward migration of near-surface water. This surface should be considered when <br /> determining methods of earthwork construction but is not used to dictate development <br /> design. However, if perched seepage at the subject property is ponded above a <br /> restrictive surface and no groundwater table exists, then the perched seepage dictates <br /> development design recommendations herein. <br /> No groundwater seepage was encountered in the test pit explorations. We expect that <br /> groundwater representative of infiltrated water slowed by low permeability, dense to very <br /> dense soil could be found perched atop the impervious till soils encountered <br /> approximately 1 to 6 feet BGS during the wetter winter months, and potentially in <br /> pockets within the till soils. Thus, proper drainage measures should be incorporated into <br /> the development plan,which are elaborated in a subsequent section of this report. <br /> CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based upon an evaluation of the data collected during this investigation, it is our opinion <br /> that subsurface conditions at the site are suitable for the proposed development, <br /> provided the recommendations contained herein are incorporated into the project <br /> design. <br /> The test pits excavated for this project encountered native, loose to medium-dense, <br /> weathered till soils within 3 feet of existing grade, which then became unweathered and <br /> dense to very dense with depth. It is our opinion that the proposed buildings can be <br /> supported on conventional foundations bearing on these competent native soils, or on <br /> compacted structural fill placed atop these soils. Dense, unweathered till encountered at <br /> depth is unlikely to require much preparation. However, if foundations will be supported <br /> on the near-surface weathered till, the surface should be compacted to a firm and <br /> unyielding condition. Further recommendations regarding the placement and <br /> compaction of structural fill can be found in a subsequent section of this report. <br /> Remnants of the old house foundation were encountered in TP-3 (northeast portion of <br /> the proposed western building). Based on the proposed final grades for the new <br /> building, it will be necessary to remove all old foundation elements and loose fill or <br /> deleterious material from the proposed building footprint. The depth of fill tends to <br /> increase to the east towards the eastern property line. <br /> Cuts of up to 7 feet are expected to reach the planned excavation bottom for the <br /> proposed western building. Along the southern property line is a short retaining wall that <br /> runs the entire length of the property. Adjacent to the proposed western building, it <br /> appears that the footing of the retaining wall is within 1 foot of existing grade. The <br /> proposed building will be set back approximately 5 feet from the southern property line at <br /> its closest point. Assuming a 1H: 1V temporary cut slope, there does not appear to be <br /> adequate space for an adequate cut slope for the excavation without the use of <br /> Page 4 of 17 <br />