Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Staff Response: The duplexes will meet all required setbacks. They measure approximately 23 feet <br /> in depth and are arranged such that the 23-foot depth faces Rainier Drive and the R-1 property to <br /> the east. This reduces the impact to the R-1 zoned properties by minimizing the amount of wall <br /> surface area facing the single-family residences. 1,200 square feet of open space is required <br /> however approximately 1,700 square feet of open space will be provided. The open space areas will <br /> be centrally located. <br /> Criterion No. 4: Visual impact to surrounding properties caused by parking facilities in the <br /> proposed development and whether such impacts are less than would result from compliance with <br /> the development standards and/or design guidelines proposed to be modified. <br /> Staff Response: 16 off-street parking stalls are required and will be provided within 2-car garages <br /> for each unit. Access to the garages will be provided from a centrally located 20-foot wide drive <br /> aisle. The design modification will not affect the parking facilities and the required parking should <br /> have no visual impact on the neighboring properties. <br /> Criterion No. 5: If the development proposes greater building height than permitted by the zone in <br /> which the property is located, does the increase in building height result in an increase in the usable <br /> open space on the property over what would be provided by meeting the development standards and <br /> design guidelines proposed to be modified? <br /> Staff Response: The duplexes will meet the 45-foot height limitation of the R-3 zone however the <br /> two easterly duplexes will exceed the maximum 28-foot height limitation within 50 feet of the R-1 <br /> zone by approximately 5 feet. The height modification will not specifically increase the amount of <br /> open space however it does provide opportunity for the open space to be centrally located and for <br /> the buildings to meet the 30-foot separation requirement of EMC 19.15.100. <br /> Criterion No. 6: If the development proposes greater building height than permitted by the zone in <br /> which the property is located, does the increase in building height impact the views or privacy of <br /> abutting residentially zoned properties? <br /> Staff Response: Due to the topography of the site, the increased building height will not impact the <br /> privacy of the R-1 zoned properties to the east or the R-3 zoned properties north and south of the <br /> subject property.No scenic views are present in this area. <br /> Criterion No. 7: Does the proposed development result in a mix of permitted residential and <br /> commercial uses allowed by the zoning in which the property is located which would not result <br /> from compliance with the development standards and/or design guidelines proposed to be <br /> modified? <br /> Staff Response: This criterion does not apply. <br /> Criterion No. 8: Does the proposed design mitigate the impacts that could be caused by relaxation <br /> of the standards which are proposed to be modified? <br /> Staff Response: The proposed design as conditioned mitigates the potential impacts caused by <br /> relaxation of the height standards. The topography of the site further lends itself to the design of the <br /> buildings due to the downward slope of the subject property in comparison to the R-1 properties to <br /> the east. <br /> { <br /> DECISION: The Planning Director APPROVES a maximum building height of 33 feet within 50 <br /> feet of an R-1 zone, subject to the following conditions: <br /> REVII17-019 <br />