1969/10/22 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

October 22,1969 continued COUNDIMAN MICHELSON I make a motion.table this resolution. (elation lost for lack of seco.) DOBLER chhe basically comes from the Planning/omission and Planning Director. The Planning Commission recognises that many of the problems that are facing the Planning Department a.Planning Monis...doe not cover this growth •problem. They only cover the brush fires L and don't have Mr.for the I major problems. I agree we should tighten our belts.but that doesn't mean to cut off the spending entirely. It should give us the guide line as to w.,..sno,,,ena the money. The city is spending end big , business is eaending.Included.this study is 515,000 for a traffic flow study end$66,000 for a specifIc plan for Me down-town core area of the • -las.,sn',"')-• are they on the priority? we,novu encourage capital to come into the mass 11 as'1.111) city but we are not.a position to do this until we take care of proPer S.'s'f.''''1.M.).'' planning. We are being asked to spend$53,000 staff time next year and 530,000 actual money for a plan that we have to have. In several cities, MOTION TO ADOPT having trouble. We must have a plan,environmental plan and methods of RESOLUTION MOORE ten years ago a.has been followed quite closely up to date. Arterial streets,parking facilities,Walter.11 Memorial.rk,public bee.etc. They had a last of six conclusions and five of them have been developed one persons word or just one thou&t. Not en.I think cne.avor. cellin ,,,,,rong,but I wanted to find out for sure so I called up asked if he felt i.Selman study..11.a be helpful. .said the city . be given only.cities una.,60,000 population Mt they must hme a er,. • c.,,,,,,to the year 2000. The senator thought.e PoPletlen woad COUNCILMS MICHELSON \ • ? ._�' p �d ��,r . . '). r, ":,,'.7:'1:". • freany 6il -Mukilteo,Everett,Seattle. /know what we need {\ capable and can do it,consultants to do it,why doesn't with thinks they can't and Ms to think