My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1970/02/18 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1970/02/18 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 8:09:55 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 5:58:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
2/18/1970
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 18,1878 cont, <br /> 24 <br /> V-2. On the north side of 41st Street the zone was <br /> the east <br /> of,the ighTo <br /> school <br /> - dibm property were both C-1. Directly across the street the ProPertY <br /> was/1-4. He sald the zoning of this property to 0-2 would not de,troy <br /> comprehensive <br /> general concept of what the land will be used for that ggnerally this <br /> will be done,but is not a stringent rule that wo,ld have to be com- <br /> plied with. Mr.Bell said he would like to refer to the findings of <br /> lwas zoned in a multiple_ Property <br /> uldacross enot prohi- <br /> bit <br /> be bThe nrecord show othut in in the her ingroperty cef the type <br /> g <br /> requested in the immediate area--B-2 across the street <br /> and C-1 adsoining. <br /> 2. He said.that his side of the street was <br /> goingresidences and the homes were down mhill. <br /> all of the homes were owned by Dr.Brust and are not well <br /> approaching <br /> 3. The e land use <br /> inthe area is going from multiple <br /> family to business uses. <br /> 4. Thas vs true. Thre <br /> re natural boundaries;however,we <br /> eek merely a logicala <br /> extension of present use of existing <br /> 5, Mr.Bell se,he felt that the central business core of the <br /> city was suffering. He didn't think the Planning Commission <br /> had the power to withhold business's from ing in <br /> outer limits because it might hurt the central Hefelt <br /> the Planning Commission actually <br /> and business men of the was protecting <br /> property <br /> owners h`than <br /> generalthe make <br /> prices do property <br /> reAlen <br /> y 6. He felt it did not seem proper that the applicant should <br /> be <br /> proof <br /> rcannot h <br /> o+ pent z He applicant.eburdeno should be <br /> the <br /> "_ d planis general area business an <br /> d <br /> he was in thus 4eneral area. <br /> 7. It is not intended,as a highway service for freeway users <br /> t it is a plan for business. <br /> Councilman Dobler asked how long the applicant had owned this property <br /> and Dr.Brush,replied approximately <br /> Planning <br /> Michelson asked if the lan had been animo <br /> and he was told yes that it was unanimous. lman Moore asked the <br /> Plannning Commission president,Mr.Root,if this iarea <br /> for B-2 according to the comprehensive land <br /> f they w elthat the <br /> was lan. Mr.ROOt said <br /> tbusiness ande <br /> this map had been set up area included <br /> and the red area on the map included the ephonehcompany. These two <br /> areas are broken by the natural topography of the land. <br /> President Vognild asked Mr.Hoot if there had been anYthing in the nature <br /> that was brought before the council y,andtCommission <br /> Mr. oo no <br /> con- <br /> siderationMrs.Kenneth Chapman pointed out that in planning for the city, <br /> w <br /> here. <br /> o not live there should not be allowed to let the propertydeteriorate. <br /> CPpsarea a said he had there for <br /> 1 the <br /> eh e semiy favor of the was p Bone, g or <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.