Laserfiche WebLink
March 25,"1970 <br /> aid that the'thingshould understand or not <br /> understand is the ordinance. It isn't the vote of the Councilman. <br /> The Councilmen ekpressed their views five to two and it wasn't <br /> a tie vote-and it couldn't poxsibly have been one so if the Mayor <br /> had some disagreements with the ordinance he should have spoken <br /> lv, expressedsoonerhe was not in dis- <br /> agreement <br /> ordinance. a taec <br /> ear <br /> view of the 'eling o he Councilmen. the ' <br /> meeting tonight he thought he had this w he wasn't <br /> Ft <br /> sure and bring <br /> this matter <br /> back hup again. Councilman Moore he would aCcept the <br /> legality <br /> of the Mayorls veto but he hodunderstood the <br /> as the constructions IIIassuming <br /> afar <br /> ofsigns <br /> al g a that could bebainterrun <br /> Mayor said he would like to <br /> bring sonhthing up that he had ndis- <br /> cussed <br /> foie <br /> said he ted some time <br /> ].: <br /> sign along the <br /> He said he•was of he had firsttoessed the concern at talk about s h i time.at 9:I <br /> • <br /> the f ethesC in the b just to control 1 thea j{ <br /> signs along Council <br /> t ly-diad <br /> major concern was freeway <br /> ordinance f haahewas His <br /> there as he felt he hadtto take the orsamble tandlthemore fe n ofthe council.signs <br /> feeling o signs <br /> "heo there <br /> beforebeen a veto the Char <br /> CCarding <br /> h toes. He then read a portion of section 3.4 of the City <br /> Councilman Lang.said that in all due respect A,the Mayor's riht <br /> of o hen did ow whathew otineton ing o and hens. There was <br /> ,.., <br /> is <br /> o to be the was n i want <br /> questionedi P 0ot knowing what heted _ ,1.. <br /> The Mayor saad that he had ice.to Y t:01y own <br /> f <br /> mind e d t intent regarding <br /> nan theywerdoing,but he felt he did not understand it in his mind <br /> hisedecision to veto the ordinance had onlY e e I.three <br /> minutes before they voted on it. <br /> Archie Baker, <br /> for several sign board comPanies,said that <br /> erhaps the Mayor just wanted to get an expression from each Coun- <br /> e sign board ordinance. As he understood this <br /> vet based regarding mainly hyon the procedures not on the ordinance itself.The <br /> Natd1:maid yes that a he pOQIe there bad. d pfa10 tonight was eseawh sertestes at that he was that <br /> meeting thee:there <br /> should be an opportunity to h her reading <br /> on the proposedordinance. <br /> • <br /> COMM/SSION Moved by Councilman L , c <br /> seconded by bt <br /> r o approve <br /> OINTMENTappointment Bryce <br /> H as a of the Planning <br /> Commission term to expire December 31,1975. <br /> Unanimously carried <br /> ARK BOARD Moved PCI BT byy c bogus,s a by Cap0rove <br /> MENT 1.1 <br /> x Anderson. Term expiring December r's appointment of Everett McGhee to the hark rd replacing <br /> Unanimously carried <br /> flJ BUSINBSS <br /> • <br /> SOLUTION Moved <br /> bionouncilma g ,seconded by Council 1 aghan to opt g� <br />