My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1970/11/12 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1970/11/12 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 8:16:52 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 6:09:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
11/12/1970
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
coUNCILVAINBTES <br /> November 12,'"9'19 <br /> 21,083.69 <br /> Equipment Rental 4,145.26 <br /> TransitPark a Recreation 9,474.40 <br /> Library 6,156.81 <br /> Sewer 3,601.13 <br /> Cater 24,921.64 <br /> TOTAL s25474-16 4 <br />• And Close money be transferred to the Payroll Fund from various funds <br /> in the amounts shown above. <br /> C.0.4156 <br /> Unanimously Carried. <br /> tASOMLNT Moved by Councilman Moore,seconded by easement from V.M.Conaway ard H..()ACounCilman Dobler,to street purposes <br /> t <br /> on the Beverly Boulevard and Colby Avenue Project. <br /> Unanimously Carried. <br /> T ANNEXATION <br /> the <br /> PETITIONCitappeared and said he had received <br /> a petition signed by 75.248 (based upon ion) foresented by e <br /> adjacentarea known as the 104th.Street Annexation. He said the total <br /> annexation is 227 acres lying <br /> he. area ee undax f the City limits in the vicinity of �I <br /> Evergreen . The petition iteself,represents 195 acres,or i <br /> ape oximately h <br /> 858c land within annexation. <br /> the most <br /> Count assessment is total assessed $3,362,333. <br /> 3 <br /> CliffY £974Drive,District <br /> appeared and saI <br /> e aldd h <br /> districte an't knowif the Council was aware that at any time 408 of a fire <br /> Yannexe9n <br /> to the City and they must provide fire protection forwholearea formerly <br /> covered by the fire district.. <br /> area and the proposed anaation immediately to the west of it <br /> ire dlitrict <br /> ~ City.' over to the g tion was such that it would be cut so far <br /> that they would have to d are <br /> planning <br /> on <br /> a new fire <br /> ataVer <br /> is t 9 purchasing U inasmuch he truck was not replaced. Also,they are in heprocess <br /> f contracting for a new fire station. He said they had presented <br /> is to the voters at the last election but that it was <br /> However,they are going to continue on with the purchase of <br /> new truck and the construction <br /> a fire station on a smaller <br /> f <br /> scale. Mr.Stevenson dwould not be the first time this <br /> this <br /> annexation. About two years ago <br /> oi <br /> an an election type annexation to 1by the people in the <br /> so mileswn ea. Be astdthe City would have o orn rI t <br /> an area that went 2 Evergreen Way as far dvie <br /> and of <br /> o cover <br /> 41 f District was not operating. <br /> attendedBruce Jones,City 1if C rence <br /> Attorney, <br /> 9 growth problem.u <br /> 1(4 He said,in fact,it was such a cost to some of the cities,that in <br /> areas of California they are trYing to de-aunY,edd.ee Sher) <br /> d. <br /> ly <br /> ve <br />� q problem <br /> covering doingthis now entin ire area <br /> y with <br /> thets.same <br /> eto their city. He said the City of Everett would btosesofnfire <br /> protection, Y�°b prohibitive. <br /> a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.