My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1970/11/18 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1970/11/18 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 8:17:15 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 6:09:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
11/18/1970
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
257. <br /> COUNCTRWINUTES <br /> November 18,1970 <br /> Issue type of assessment,the assessment is <br /> , the COnnection is made,and will continue for aspera at the <br /> .However,if the property is vacant,the 1 <br /> until a construction of some sort is cethe connection is made to the sewers. in bee i Start and <br /> though,the <br /> constructionentire <br /> rtyo len e being who pays at a <br /> financing so ed on the total cost,in one we are talking about <br /> higher under the LID method than it would cocase nceivably be <br /> issue,over <br /> wouldbut it off much.sooner. bePer.,of 30 years,so your monthly cost lunder the b <br /> promised them sewers t 52 0 yearperiodunder <br /> e <br /> Mr.Rise of Upper Ridge Road stated that some years ago, te <br /> 1962,his area was o <br /> Urban Development Funds. He asked how come this wasn't beingdone right now. He said that <br /> everyone <br /> s"" given sewers at this rate and now the City is of 540.00 <br /> a some <br /> Rd, dentS Per fro. y <br /> 'flc x ne prom,ed. " years go att foot. He asked again wh they weren't.d the <br /> the sewers that they <br /> o „AAA Mayor on said this gentleman was bringing up a problem to be solved today. He said that the that <br /> do,bad, was not responsible r llong-termY City <br /> Council <br /> Administrations;however,that tney were at the disadvantage of <br /> having to go back and reconstruct exactly what happened in the <br /> hluow drat_ past. This couldn't all be solved y <br /> n <br /> ad all oAle.” ' problems,such as federal funding on some of these so it would seem that there would have to be some alIf <br /> work sessions with the community to walk through this so that they ,, <br /> q}� <br /> A,,8 could have an understanding of what the community was told,so <br /> AA, that the Council could provide <br /> AA might see it right now,and have a redsonable discussion <br /> p ple or ni }ars ago se <br /> it was very difficult to sit at this meeting and respond to • <br /> ghat s said to t �. <br /> 2esidena,Vognild commented.oa the differences an the two <br /> theda f fin8noIng,explaining that the experience has n <br /> sulth those that have paid for their sewer improvements undered n,1 <br /> 6 hProgram <br /> 9 c In f P <br /> will be <br /> a person will spread it over a longer period of time and h <br /> yearly ess because of periodf time. it be d over g greater under the Spdit Rate Program than under the LID. However, ''., <br /> bled no_ <br /> . Mr.Dobler asked the City Engineer if in reviewing this <br /> f r <br /> ed a <br /> k 1 ng �j <br /> a a <br /> SYstem in th,area of the City,and Mr.Haglund said that about <br /> n na s rn s rs area <br /> ' there was a study made for the dev op of <br /> „Ar <br /> nor.f . y talkingf f in <br /> tn. there are two things to remember. 111 As t, <br /> entleman ha.mentioned,there has been an Increase in cost <br /> from 1962 or whenever the area was annexed to he present time, <br /> the <br /> other is that this is where we have found a difficultyf programs for the <br /> o <br /> those' City were promised in a dollar costs without <br /> engineering , <br /> to ascertain that they could be done at <br /> there were fire stations,park lands,a lotofothings,including <br /> I g': <br /> '8,81 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.