Laserfiche WebLink
71 <br /> February 24,1971 <br /> • arl <br /> liraring was <br /> provide five <br /> HEARING 2,m fdheld <br /> se n <br /> ' -b hgflna;3 d h fl <br /> 21£x- yid N3ia pN E 4He Y a pt o <br /> • t{S[fa E f o rw q B 2h€ I€1 2 q ne <br /> gd�4h2exsT '�('" �bY i a i <br /> f 9 C d8 <br /> fle 1 recently on Madison npe,and it that time they had <br /> installed gravel sldewdflfs b6hind'the curb gutter, <br /> ny a <br /> e- but fo.nd them to he very'vnsatrsfacterY <br /> zot all o sale t - <br /> n5 0 contacted the Council and'reguested <br /> propertypermission to contact the owners <br /> area and tell them the City smuld participate in ,iL.I.D.to construct concrete sidewalks,the ty's <br /> ethey <br /> ` at1putt inc epe <br /> ?notified they received approrimately 25,answers <br /> ckd <br /> Y 6 intention this response the Council had gone ahead with a with <br /> sidewalks in this area a3',tonight was the hearing <br /> aposed L lly'6 'consists o <br /> property 7,000 lineal feet of 5 foot sidewalks,the <br /> cost to be borne by the oWners with the• 3'libubi.ect to the improveMents dittrict is 8225 350 00 ;`. <br /> exception of 84500.00 Which would be the cost of a gravel <br /> sidewalk in the arca snd would be contributed by the <br /> City. The evaluation placed unon th.tend for that area <br /> 56 k. <br /> a1uf,$102,290.00 making it a total of 9327,660.00. The <br /> {., <br /> ''estimated cost of the assessment to thi.ai.tri.e <br /> P17,500 00. There were no outstanding assessments <br /> Validation of <br /> :signaturesr pof protest,456 of the uners and 536 <br /> cififlib-total <br /> RuebbIl Davis said he understrod that tile grlfcousse was <br /> a2 i9 J, h participating al.D.and he coula understand <br /> p <br /> of the street it wobld probably ruin all of those large <br /> beautiful trees,however,he said he did fcel the golf- <br /> ,SJ <br /> improvement <br /> asked the city Entine..and City Attorney if this <br /> at <br /> couldn't be done. Bruce Jones,city Attorney,said <br /> nless the sidewalk was constrUcted on yOUr PrOPertY <br /> zi is that legally you could not be assessed for <br /> t .improvs <br /> If <br /> oO Perry, - Anglin and Bob <br /> '.1H Beyer,all spoke against thg proposed L.I.D. <br /> x. he Councilman <br /> s <br /> .»mYf_ thee peed L.I.D. r uc_re rdewalks <br /> an Colby brhjted. <br /> Unanimously carried <br /> HEARING Hearing was h s <br /> -requestingin the te4461 area. The City Enqineer said th.e the Post <br /> Off.,war 1 area be re-named so as to coincide with the street north <br /> or 1st Street,etc. Jim Loveson,Tom Lewis and Harriett Olson <br /> wr <br /> of it. In other words,that McDougal would extend on into <br /> the Lowell area and be called Mccougal rather than 4th Street, <br /> all spoke against the proposed re-naming of various streets. <br /> fl <br /> r 41111111111j <br />