Laserfiche WebLink
Hilli..7, August18,1971 r vea=l, _ an drroe o s s e ar),ande$400 a h..(54.,6 ) 'The criteria to be considered,as outlined Or,PiCds 4 <br /> proposed management fee, <br /> d p atingce ures to _use in2 the garage, <br /> ix <br /> nal b _udget costs estimated for the on)n hsn of eq nt a p bidderso chose, <br /> ience summa ySince it was felt that certain costs would <br /> he same, <br /> . , no matter who operated the garage, <br /> e ccns.dtant <br /> ids and revise <br /> ° )the estimated a m for h s asked to analyze e b tgets to reflect these constant costs.firrn <br /> • <br /> o 'amo A sented the bidder's estimates. The V1$20 954..sed eI. co 533,952.....AeConnd$41,310. To this for fire insurance and <br /> was oco expels o b g otals..s to <br /> £orlon 5 'ngton m toand v• tr.A Prior to the bid award,I interviewed merchants in Everett d Diamond sarking lot OPerstor. <br /> ji z sh pointed i <br /> 60-day <br /> full charge of the rates and all policies conce <br /> ', satisfied with the management,and that the Council <br /> with the Phe parking garage manager will be the m1 it <br /> days e opera andof d to <br /> ` stay e the C <br /> l j <br /> iiil. d, , <br /> Like any other department head,the garage manager <br /> presents a p Council provides <br /> ' t final approval. The budget approved by the <br /> fh5 <br /> conty is <br /> t proposedq <br /> e first <br /> six months. They compare as follows: Bid Budget <br /> A <br /> IYManagement eP5 <br /> 6 <br /> It,1,t (cashier, can <br /> g s 9s6 <br /> 19so <br /> $°,,, p e s e1 P, 50 50 <br /> ) ,rt a<a n�e�er.,e l,s <br /> # Maintenance s9a s90 <br /> Iia ��,pUtilities <br /> *consultant's 6-29 cost est.) 1960 3,o00• <br /> applies 336 <br /> 900 <br /> Insurance 240 290 <br /> 510 _�— <br /> d ert.s g g 10,143 <br />