Laserfiche WebLink
foundFebruary 23,/9,2 <br /> r eating of the Everett Citv Councol was held <br /> at 7:ZU Po..februfP'e2r,'1912,'President Rucker presiding. Upon I <br /> it was that all c ncilmen were E011 Call • <br /> u <br /> Minutes p he Meeting held February 16,1972were approved as printed. 3 <br /> BEARINGe proposed L e installation <br /> fasewer lones in the area known as 51st Street Southwest, <br /> west of E.Street. Mr.Haglund,City Engine.,said the <br /> district was roughly abutting prePeo.Of tStreet <br /> SouthwestElmS . <br /> 686 He said the petition requesting the work was <br /> nedtbet <br /> 658. rs sigowners <br /> based upon e and that 1008 of the cost of the Work <br /> would be borne� g <br /> by the property owners. <br /> ,„„ Current assessed valuation of the 259 of the <br /> t imp $ a are 22,4441 assessments <br /> and rt is 1$22,4402 an dds the <br /> spreadassessment was eebas s o`the e Method <br /> byeording to the R.C.W.and thatth const 201439 ts had otal coseen t of <br /> the improvement. <br /> ed <br /> Ruth P thin t f there <br /> was a Packard, property owner he LID, <br /> against <br /> • property possibility <br /> would higherat the ow eunt to ebidsec a in for <br /> the nst ti was told by t <br /> butnshouldthe <br /> • ncil ahere was no way to foresee am yhigher <br /> whentethe he. <br /> the <br /> • c there would be considerably <br /> g prior to <br /> awarding the bid. <br /> nthe <br /> ck Egiksof-•514-s a loved j outside <br /> eboundary o theelL red why i tbe <br /> n tkOn.Streetaadlittle further t0 de his <br /> and• adfe doth that ted. `.i <br /> was thattofarther would <br /> a the N <br /> construction o umpings would <br /> hew <br /> considerablypand at was.not feasible totdocthis at <br /> rease the <br /> thisetime. <br /> Moved by Counci.an xinch,seconded Dobler, <br /> to instruct o prepaCouncilman <br /> re an ordinance <br /> establiehingtthe pose L <br /> Unanimously arried <br /> HEARING Hearing <br /> FAmilY High D the <br /> l/2 C oeed rezone from k44 Multiple forthe <br /> area south of41st Community <br /> Colby, Zone <br /> to the' '. <br /> alley east of Reid in eDirector,said <br /> that October n19 ring w y the gP <br /> sthearequest sbyeG prises Com- <br /> mission 'y9e9lI <br /> es g approvalssion recommended N <br /> December• City Council. The Council,at ins <br /> • ed..refer this the recommendation that request-backe <br /> with <br /> At their uary a meeting,the planning Commission <br /> the entire blockathe reasons:exressed the oofnd rezoning <br /> for <br />