Laserfiche WebLink
47 lir <br /> February 23,1972 <br /> • <br /> To7 Collins,representative of Guardran Enterprises,said <br /> the area in question to be rezoned was <br /> deteriorating <br /> He szoning <br /> v <br /> involved <br /> surrounded by inverse <br /> a/z, <br /> it would in fdct be an inverse <br /> spot original 1 r <br /> hearing as far as knew,no prop y le ted to the <br /> rezone of this property. <br /> Moved <br /> i theCouncilman tt ve <br /> conded bv Councilman Michelson, <br /> otd pare an ordinance ng <br /> the nip property. <br /> ROLL <br /> LL <br /> AYES:cADeb.,Aldcroft,Kirch; ( <br /> Langus,Michelson,Gipson,Rucker <br /> Motion lost. 1• <br /> xeAalxc LOW held <br /> proposed <br /> from Single a <br /> mily <br /> 2 tefical,f he <br /> of South Broadwaya d Puget Drive,better k ah^ <br /> Everett <br /> TiaDirteryComp erti ncn d said h 'Council <br /> • <br /> referred the application i gi g business <br /> to oxenreconsideration. Ysaid i back for <br /> 'back to the Planning scion <br /> comparison to both ebproposed tc Development P <br /> ' proposed t- himprwementsoi aidla <br /> reviehand of h .pr at regular <br /> Planning g issi g held roJanuary hl said <br /> the reports conflict. The Halorin <br /> gain st c cthesStaff <br /> that a d)pointll raised. There I1 defined <br /> cut-off point between <br /> iroperties <br /> n this recommercsidential <br /> traal nsitional, �.� <br /> hstable and must be protected. The entire Eastmont <br /> am <br /> large and complex that commercial <br /> a ubeec area <br /> oxhis t c dchan <br /> efines <br /> edge of a <br /> hood <br /> and must b <br /> anteh9 areas. to'develop iintensely around <br /> protectede <br /> He d the <br /> to traffic <br /> 1.improvement Sta. s a problemhe Planning Commission feeling cthat this particular�with t <br /> parcelcould not <br /> be ssfuifor -family <br /> ily residential under <br /> the conditions created bym <br /> the impro the <br /> property south of 84th Street will be prohibited <br /> since this <br /> section is designated'Limited Access'. The Staff - <br /> fore concur with the <br /> approval of this rezone,Planning <br /> but at the some time washes to r <br /> express itself s <br /> (1)As requested <br /> by the wn aioA,t will <br /> alongbe considered Diagonaly'n the curvent research <br /> be -ed. - ) <br /> (2)The Staff <br /> recommends v <br /> al of this rezone because it • <br /> feels t hlis truly for residential <br /> purposesand does apprc <br /> non-conforming use wishingMtonexpand or wishing to become <br /> • <br /> conforming. <br />