Laserfiche WebLink
lav ''.4,I.� <br /> c ] <br /> I <br /> May 24,1972 <br /> rd I <br /> would stop a terrific bottleneck a corner of Pacific : ;. <br /> and <br /> Cedar thaMoved by cilma 1 b nth, i <br /> to terminato the hearing an this dLocal rc <br /> propositionthe Council a new for imnistriox,and to instruct the Arministration to provement <br /> 1 '�. <br /> t by the railroad tracks,on <br /> • <br /> generally <br /> north the b 1landfill°nthe east by the Ona y arriedfreeway,and r I. <br /> , <br /> Councilman f <br /> the meeting tonight would be willing to work with the <br /> some directionand alternatives as ! I{/ Ito this improvement. <br /> Councilman Gipson 'd pular y interested <br /> in hearing from the is in the area. I..+..,' <br /> COMMISSTO <br /> Plarrnin <br /> rector,reported on <br /> lac Rxs Ni Y g h taverns as requested Yad that apparently the concern o <br /> er <br /> out c is <br /> taverns growg <br /> ereby <br /> prat <br /> operty n would <br /> PorkyCan Harry's and ed the be permitted in this area,and the probler.existing at 011 <br /> actual location of a tavern on the site,and <br /> volved the impact of the taverns on �ngnresidentialproperties with regard to noise. • <br /> He said the question implied pp <br /> zkrely,should the City Council <br /> g tt <br /> the shop- <br /> ala <br /> the Planning Coninission recommended to the lapprove a re-zone some months . 1 <br /> sons for doing so rvere <br /> ago that this-.ea should remain in the 5-2 zoning. The rea- <br /> b a <br /> that indicationthat this . <br /> e i9 as solely a neighborhood ative act of the one on h g i rid,that te ting uses ; <br /> ude this action unless addifional justification <br /> was forthcoming. After reviewing this again,it was still <br /> ere-affirm position ffff <br /> ''.4 <br /> Planning Commission's wishes to <br /> '. <br /> ! <br /> of recommending no change in the current zoning t View Ridge. ! <br /> said rreviewing t of the performance s for • <br /> a nposition <br /> 1 C <br /> h tTosee. he f I <br /> sta-dards which the Commission feelz could logically placed in the code,would cover lighting, f''' <br /> noise. The latter ital.-noise—is under study by the Staff <br /> at this time. The remaining <br /> e stzndards might alroady be <br /> established es existing Code.Department.possibility said <br /> is being d <br /> wording c9uld be established in the zoning code--specifying .1 <br /> condithe <br /> resntial proerties,although probably not to any large ; <br /> exten. .said should the count sire y o attach ;l�� <br /> standard!:to taverns,,,Ild stop their impact on ! <br /> .'1.tr <br /> .rh: <br />