Laserfiche WebLink
0,9s <br /> 3uHy )u: <br /> WHEREAS the Everett City Council upon due h Consideration a,'1 <br /> deem it desirable in the best.interests of property welfare as requested health, <br /> der • <br /> enter. <br /> Ofollows: <br /> RESOLVED BY TEE CIT.COUNCIL of <br /> THE CITY of Fas <br /> SeCtion 1: The Ci lding0w eh required <br /> Hs <br /> �'. <br /> b bdescribed NOTICE <br /> F1DG � 1 f hereinabove <br /> ed City of Everett Building Code providedwork a11 <br /> limited-to boaing p ter attempt to keep out unauthorized 1 <br /> . <br /> persons until City 1provided <br /> said t itfterdaeofmalingbegistered mail or certified mail of notice othe <br /> rein <br /> described Everett City Council order I each of <br /> • Moa <br /> c, <br /> as <br /> ) <br /> of the unsafe <br /> - desc 1 buildinand g()/CEOFSUNSA (s)-, <br /> I ING(Sor )orti°n(e)thereof { <br /> "-Section Buildingan <br /> and h <br /> y <br /> is authorized and d' d forthwith give of the <br /> herein described Everett City Council order(resolution)to <br /> thoseeach of UNSAFE dnthehrenabove described N BOIS)as a er(s1 of the une£ building(s), <br /> structure(s), • <br /> or portion(s)thereof deecribedin + i <br /> said NOTICE <br /> of UNSAFE BUILDING(S). <br /> UnanCe carried <br /> CHANGE ORDER by Con Gipson, ° d Councilman Dobler to <br /> aprove Chanr4in the amount $,158..for <br /> reinforcement o a floor slabbearing <br /> capacity in the main <br /> warehouse room at the City Support Center. {{ <br /> Motion carried with Councilmen Michelson and Kinch voting no. 51 <br /> JOB ACCEPTED Moved by Councilman Dobler,seconded be Councilman Kinch t <br /> accept the improvement adisonSt t between vergreen Y#� <br /> Waxy and Kenwood Drive as complete byrTri State Construction <br /> C pony•a <br /> Unanimously Tarried [[ff <br /> DAMAGE CLAIM reported o the damageclaim Harold on for • <br /> repairJofceew t 5l,1313.15. said <br /> that it was h ids <br /> Meade gafromath ay a property a ioraated <br /> w was agreed t p°e ped <br /> line,thowever the ofof <br /> sta a cause <br /> fv sine to - main was <br /> repaired as part the work Mr.Jon said thatlooking <br /> at. favorably and M i 1 ld <br /> argued that both the line leading to d the <br /> fitting on the sewer main were broken d it wouli be 1 <br /> extreovlY difrrdult to say whether { th r <br /> was ti.e cause of the failure. In any event thed <br /> benefit from the work by the replarement of a T stub and <br /> Wye t the mainpart of the work.. 1 E tti k <br /> in and around the fitting at the mainwould be as much <br /> s k/3 f thet thew a recommending ,� <br /> thettled w b as with _ <br /> figure f$379.30 total <br /> trectors work. He said 1/3oftotal c of the <br /> b 1/ f.the'vest B thought should <br />