Laserfiche WebLink
201 <br /> July 12,1972 <br /> 1 was held <br /> found that all <br /> d Councilmen ]man Gipson who wasexcuse <br /> e mtea Minutesof the meeting held y 1972 were approved t. " <br /> SURPLUS PROPERTY Moved by Councilman Dobler,seconded <br /> Councilman <br /> croftto instruct the <br /> dm nistration to contract for 1 Department <br /> e�tm t.5� <br /> c rSewer Department properties which had n el s Y Y t CarriedUnanimously declareae" <br /> SUPPORT CENTMR <br /> PARKING <br /> ahworMichelson <br /> architect on the support center job to prepare plans and <br /> adjacent to he ter. _fees to hthe prime <br /> call for bid for a parking let on.Peehiee ef eat the <br /> rate of GE. i, <br /> LESS DANCERS Carried <br /> y Attorney the report t }i <br /> was on City the Attorney, d Aant <br /> .f said Snohomic ish ordinance which says that you canrm <br /> dance topless in a place where liquor is sold. The City of <br /> Everett does not have such an ordinance. Their <br /> rdinances <br /> ct,and <br /> theconduct.stions w hertoples dancers <br /> disorderlyhave words such ao ...considered asley �i{S <br /> ruledHe said the court had that topless dancing came under <br /> the specific ordinance of the County and that Snohomish <br /> Countyncould use police powers and regulate under this <br /> ordina <br /> in regard to the City of Everett,the court could not find # <br /> that topless dancing was lewd behavior and afore could jz. <br /> said the City could take this to court and try to t rule it would con.under this ordinance. <br /> F <br /> emo n itthe Council shortly and would have ordinance <br /> COUNCIL BILL 20]-]2 <br /> Fri'READING <br /> '.r <br /> An ordinance amending the traffic code of the City of Everett <br /> by estat,ishing penalties for which fine,only hall be <br /> finehie seimposed,and <br /> ntences <br /> 3r4(ECC n4 imprisonment4 001 0 <br /> anedeclar v nem y to exist. f Ordinance No.1z3]3 <br />