Laserfiche WebLink
42 <br /> J9ndar7 301'1974 <br /> 4km mil i iesd ed1 al el Al.ewxe;N1 <br /> FIRB pLAAN'CeELE `"` ,fnnNrzei yxin3 dOt e1OmN <br /> Sid quickly review h problem-theCity par <br /> - 4's <br /> ALR ti to-advertisement zsYfor-bids- 11 Alar b1 received 1 bids-- <br /> onensu h bid was from Lord Electric <br /> lfor the sum of 612,01tter ulatinwho <br /> awas <br /> -week"w <br /> bidder t n ore the included stalled for completion date slide. T second <br /> such <br /> was from <br /> t cab an ec 18.90. a Council hm t ng <br /> uch id was fzom January 300 Electric for repreElectric sentative <br /> cn ming de January30,the specified <br /> Meet <br /> eetithe <br /> from contractCcompletiontdate <br /> buted he <br /> could provide the equal oor h and quality and meet the contract comp - <br /> but could provide wire of equal higher quality <br /> Clan data. <br /> Hefor <br /> said his opinion will deal with the position <br /> cof ifLordElectric that"pal <br /> the <br /> equal'clause in the Section 1;21 o4 standardC biddin <br /> specifications, <br /> ublic works construction,no incorpoated by reference ia City's deenact—, <br /> pecifications ebe held being.applicable in this case" <br /> wise specified should be required for all bidders,thereby making this layed <br /> delivery date applicable-to all.bidders. <br /> said it wee hie opinion that in analyzing the bids presentedh City <br /> Heusi",the face of the the staff must tike elan nide it theform received; <br /> tion called <br /> thus,of theofete of he bed=Instruction tonBidder'snship to portion ofsthecspecifica- <br /> ins of Completion"apparent <br /> the ne the low bidd phot meet <br /> then it ea readily ePor oe th Lora eleo,'that ae's <br /> nen <br /> Lhe r h 22,qua"time of such.tl n. -Thothrepresentative f Lord Electric <br /> and can be disqualified as such. "though the Mr Eaendricks said St was his <br /> opinion t atthat hesuch could tovide' beeralf before <br /> eittt#n that d. L h l h b ken inho <br /> ilex i n b s aub- <br /> miffing the bid. <br /> ter reviewing specifications,1 found that such equals pre- <br /> 1106 visionaisfclearly a part ofthe City's specof tions 1n the the specs lic worke - <br /> ectionipp=eps f bytheof thepemerican PublicWorks <br /> prepared Chapter document and shall be h <br /> edstandardi sp hereby ion maAH a part of this contract -- <br /> Association <br /> oetiot earelmade aopar of said it should be noted ntrt hese standard rzeraised,", <br /> ycpersoe made a part of all City construction contracts and a recbgn <br /> by persons in the contracting industries. <br /> standard specification1 9 i hspecifications <br /> cific i n <br /> ,brand or mode"isim nti d,it"wherever understood fel s <br /> Sn Cbe ete sathe <br /> a manufacturers name, <br /> to fellow thereafter whether or not it does in fact." <br /> Phrase or equal is ..- <br /> MOTION w1T10)MwN - <br /> Councilman one cilk the dcrofftoand <br /> hCo Councilman Langue withdrew their motion to continue.fb= <br /> wee <br /> award <br /> f <br /> hoved by Counciimaanichelaon,seconded by'Councilman Langur Lb award to Lha low <br /> bidder under the' e <br /> their bid was submitted. <br /> Roll wee called withCouncilmenMich 1 Alderoft voting yes; <br /> Councilmen EbertGipson and Ainch votilangus, <br /> ng no; d Councilman Rucker abstaining. <br /> Motion Lost <br /> Movedonby CouncilmanAL tuft,seconded by Councilman Ebert to table this item <br /> fox week. <br /> 1 <br /> �.l <br />