Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 166 <br /> A E City April 10, 974 <br /> 6 the following <br /> grant s <br /> 1. Sick LA ntive Officer's leave of absence with pay far <br /> we eeaUpon employment with s e Cite, Appointive Officers <br /> pfter <br /> hp • <br /> a11. b 2any sick leave is used,the el....ehall accroe k t <br /> e rate of one day <br /> a maximum f 120 days. The use <br /> Sick g discretion f the <br /> Myor. Should <br /> ymonthlydisability to Ofeer <br /> ae a benefitresulting <br /> esalt gfomany insurance eprovided by <br /> City, <br /> he City shall padifference entheam t <br /> fh neandheApneOfficers n rmalnw hly Sala.. <br /> In no case shall such Sack Leave payment <br /> exceed 120 work days. <br /> 2 uneraebe When aad be the Ma r,Alt ve.r,t8.9 <br /> e off <br /> lh grantedarrangements <br /> reqsoblanecmwith <br /> vtoassa <br /> withfuneral anndattend funeraserces. <br /> Section 2 City council <br /> A. Members of the C Council o City <br /> verettbe o requestuco <br /> I aow n diofl i the a cover- <br /> 111 ragertohbeCcomp s thesfollowing: <br /> I1 c e Basic Medical coverage for then Councilman and his dependents. <br /> 2. Ma uveal coverage for the Councilman and his dependents. <br /> -. Sectio3.n 3 chiropractic care for the Councilman and his dependents. <br /> '1l Mayor: <br /> r t 1a: A Ma of th c ahatl be ofi cersazl s fle9 in <br /> It. eyoome Seinabove P nova <br /> r 1 cos a a <br /> 4�5 I"I, RePealvn9: <br /> 1. Ivry�,' p further resolved that Resolution No. a mended is hereby <br /> repealed. <br /> 1'IF. Roll w called with all councilmen voting yes except Councilman 661 n who <br /> jn d no. Motion carried <br /> I <br /> 1t.f I EAB STREET NEEDS CERTIFICATE <br /> L,` Councilman M uthoriee <br /> thto Mayorby C ssign Kinch,seconded <br /> a erty Certification e Review a 1974 f Update <br /> 1i afeII. etNeC <br /> ds. <br /> Roll wascalled Councilmen voting yes. <br /> M <br /> otion carried <br /> r 1'.1 ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS <br /> It <br /> Lloyd Henning f the Engineering reported the Public W <br /> Committee aselected 24 firms to Department contacted 4 <br /> s <br /> done bythe City. 2ihad responded with apsnposand Staff <br /> reviewedhad these <br /> epv � aehfirms. <br /> These were interviewed a one wselected for each b as follows: <br /> !I <br /> ifs", <br />