Laserfiche WebLink
711 <br /> 469 <br /> December 26,1973. <br /> 296-]3 <br /> Second and Final Reading: <br /> prov or the.vacation of Lake.street lying' Fielding•" <br /> An-0731020. <br /> st of Evergreen 11Attorneyy for ePetitioner for thisd any <br /> '7001e-being-given n <br /> this meeting ing'for he r 'that Hearing was addi- <br /> tional held <br /> on December 12th at which time all facts were supposed to haveMeen presented. <br /> edrfcks,City-Attorney,said the Council could entertain policy a g enta <br /> 11.g,: <br /> kime. <br /> vee by C cflman Gipson,seconded by Councilman Michelson to table the die- <br /> cuealon for three weeks. <br /> Roll Wasmalled wise ncilmen Dobler,Aldcro£t,kirsch-a Rucker v and <br /> and <br /> Lang ;Michelson 'Gipson voting yea. - <br /> otion lost4yy <br /> r f h Radio h adjacent h d protested <br /> n va g h ople I, <br /> the owner <br /> if the-has d F felt h <br /> would Ida park lot as athrough'crest hick would ec considerable <br /> accidents. <br /> a <br /> Sohn Bryant Protested the vacation d bed The poatpon o d f1' <br /> until an investigation could a f h Evergreen ay studyand untilhe 1,1j <br /> ou it made a study of thela i g Commission recommendations. <br /> YI <br /> Councilmen Aldcxoftk 'if Mr Bryant was'representing the Planning Commissi <br /> and Mr.Bryanta h he was a memberof hCommission,he was'appear- <br /> ing today as a private <br /> h <br /> u Y 9h]m ldc f k if M1 - b h la <br /> Mr. <br /> M y id y h understood <br /> P h <br /> i 0I <br /> 6b t f..- h i Sen 1019- k 1 <br /> ale df y p blic f ei <br /> that it would disrupt F flaw. 414 <br /> , <br /> Councilmanwas <br /> f h of the property would de off for street 4,4 <br /> he told possible. <br /> Billoot of the 1 1 h. meeting <br /> a Com- <br /> mid... <br /> '.#'... <br /> was diff y anh information <br /> at h 1 <br /> mioavon meet n9 e`sald-;numb h tF_Wexler Thad bo ae0square-feetIII <br /> with a building o 27,000 o owner actually did n 11 the <br /> land t he 1 that theetraffic hc w between00 d 1,100 cars <br /> u Lae B et. ,.al o,according ton r present ordinance,the length <br /> ofone block ti.s no exceed 1,200 feet and ifthisstreet s d <br /> lengthen e block iconsiderably. questioned the validityof thevacation <br /> when it violated-pother City ordinance. <br /> Mr. <br /> Wilcox said the block length is in the Su-aivraion•Oxd nce and would not <br /> apply to this vacation. -0. <br /> North <br /> 1 property,Petitioner, d if d.._.purchasehe 1 hproperty <br /> ti tb City, k atlpresent hnt he did not own ale would l of at.n he happy wapproper- <br /> wex er <br /> Dobler asked if he had any time frame in mind on the purchase and Mr. ,._.,'. <br /> maid no. <br /> Mir <br />