My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1975/06/25 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1975/06/25 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 9:12:41 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 8:20:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
6/25/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IBS <br /> June 25,1975 <br /> ed that a letter be given <br /> After to mr.considerstating able d that what <br /> aware Kinch <br /> cave kosbedone to involved.bring his <br /> building <br /> ergusancode so lofhthes co <br /> On motion the meeting recessed into executive session at 4.15 P.M. <br /> The <br /> t 7:00 P <br /> in the <br /> hambers of the <br /> erett City Hall,President KinCh <br /> reSid- <br /> 41 <br /> Councilman <br /> rolsed,Uponting of the Everett City Council reconvened a .M. <br /> ular e Gipson who was excused. <br /> Minutes <br />{ nsoc sedat all Councilmen were present exp <br /> Minutes of the meeting held June 18,1975 were approved as printed. <br /> HUD CERTIFICATES <br /> Ed Moser,HUD - ofpoPiilned <br /> by President eithe for the Everett Housing and aCommunity <br /> oeveopment applcation <br /> HEARI <br /> Lloyd RX i reorted this w a public hearing for the <br /> creation Henning, construction was <br /> Street onthe w from t 3 Streets,33rd5 <br /> north side fromPine, Streethe east <br /> Street <br /> from the <br /> south line of,hhalf of t 6,Block EversLand First Addition,to ,and 2ndStreet onthe south side from <br />'•.; Cedar street to Pine Street. constituting 458 o <br /> He petitions <br /> oofnt based on <br /> he ownersreported <br /> ba ers based on total ownership. The etitionor k was <br /> signed 678 of <br /> nby 55%of o area,and 638 <br /> of the <br /> owners based oo <br /> the f t- <br /> age. The petitionwi at o tcostthe wort,would be <br /> borne <br /> cury the P eywears. <br /> Thean plus <br /> 258 f the <br /> n <br /> e improvement, <br /> is$64,170,,assessed v a estimated of the dimprovements v $60,209.81,which <br /> 15 within the limits of the law. <br /> Counciaman Ebert felt this E.I.E.was not beneficial to the property owners <br /> prot <br /> sting <br /> se ,sand Mr?dif in effect this wasn't an improvement o only half <br /> Henning replied that ye this was true. <br /> ofastreet <br /> CounGilman Rucker felt he could not vote for this petition because of the <br /> effect it had on the other property 08mers in the area. <br />�r.';: <br /> 8:122chKe=d1man Rucker,seconded by Councinan Ebert to conclude the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.