|
July 2,1975
<br /> GROSS DEPARTMENT EMPLOYER '
<br /> PAYROLL DEDUCTION CONTRIB.
<br /> 001 Legislative $ 1, 463.20 $ 0489.0] 6 974.13 $ 163.70 i
<br /> 003 004 Administration al 819.36 1,287.43 -1,531.93 599.67
<br /> 006. _ 681.63 ,409.50 4,218.58 1,321.88 1
<br /> 010 Finance 4 Bud 1964.64 2 354.]2 1 609.92 32
<br /> 205.17
<br /> 011 C Clerk g 2,619.12 1,0]5.]4 1,543.38 557.05
<br /> 01122 City Treasurers ,816.16 ,254168 3,561.48 1,162.44
<br /> 0 Accounting 2061 3] 2695.36 3.15 1,812.21 '5]3.2]
<br /> 015 A Information Sys. 5 1,909.52 3,151.85 ,076.51
<br /> 016 Purchasing y 2,196.29 1,065.13 1,131.16 1 428.55
<br /> 1 Communy Oev. 1,417.11 4,652.46 6,764.65 2,395.10
<br /> .Engineering024': 1,629.92 8,462.63 13,167.29 4,675.00
<br /> 031 Poice 54,559,.08 20,309.183 4,254.90 7,431.50 1
<br /> 5
<br /> 032 See 85,680.34 32,]88.3]
<br /> 033 Comm/Bldg.ga
<br /> Fac. 4,226:23 1,671.08 2555.15 891.97 4913.99 1
<br /> Total Gen.Fd $209,343.17 $80,102.44 $129,240.]3 $26,696.08
<br /> 101 Park a Rec. 20,]16.1] 6,974.20 13,]41.9] 3,580.31
<br /> 110 Library ],9]2.48 2,925.35 5,047.13 1,693.32
<br /> H1 ; .
<br /> Street 19,167.34 JJOJJ
<br /> , . 11,843.88 4,147.88
<br /> 18228] 16,43]29465525655166 3304]6133161685 26884559.01ter 253532 5]08] 3313211.64 7,573.25 96313.Cit $ 15826] $12 $20],409.3 $ --6, 12% !`
<br /> C.O.#444 11
<br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yea. _'��''
<br /> Notion Carried
<br /> ECS'S DRIVE
<br /> N s o
<br /> 111'
<br /> the rr
<br /> street
<br /> h EngineeringDepartment that during des oth d determined that
<br /> toerdjacetve[c neighbor-ho d l disruption to the adjacent properties,if could igher, d in the majority £ should 6 1 than the1 street. As the new street grade£ re h old water n (which haslee thanS de-
<br /> sirable°Over), impractical to raise the d 1be consider high S cat adjacent properties and driveways.Therefore,(t was determined that the war 1100 needed layering.xated what awork under water
<br /> agreements
<br /> tYr
<br /> j£othe design of this project.
<br /> Mr.Malso thathe 11 relocation dee i }
<br /> work since the c 4�during the negotiationsdesign
<br /> for the £the a lane w ,sise ax s project.ign select
<br /> effective
<br /> ethateri610049xon,alternativedea re re-
<br /> ;
<br /> quested consultant.the
<br /> aystraia(ais now was i and
<br /> contract
<br /> to miiton is Being te -house - ver, a Statee not additional usage of ndc 1 services)d62P contract be retainedclarification the
<br /> £ limitation increased necessary
<br /> eratr ls i£sca the ojc[designvide projectrministrtio reo1Cvhan baid n0±icaise. Mren said is recommended that the fee limitation D
<br /> itY
<br /> aa by$stood for Ne eulservices t be provided by URSCompanyof Seattle far[e design of Peck's Drive improvement.
<br />
|